head to head · open source
Agentic-Bug-Hunter vs CyberStrike
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,596 GitHub stars, 985 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. CyberStrike has 3,374 stars, 583 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Agentic-Bug-Hunter leads on adoption by 66% (5,596 vs 3,374 stars). Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT; CyberStrike is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, CyberStrike 17%. CyberStrike was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai-security, bug-bounty, ethical-hacking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Agentic-Bug-Hunter | CyberStrike | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.6K | ★ 3.4K |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 985 | ⑂ 583 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You weight community size — 5.6K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CyberStrike if
- You want the CyberStrike feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and CyberStrike fits your workflow better
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
About CyberStrike
English 简体中文 繁體中文 한국어 Deutsch Español Français Italiano Dansk 日本語 Polski Русский Bosanski العربية Norsk Português (Brasil) ไทย Türkçe Українська বাংলা Ελληνικά Tiếng Việt हिन्दी The first open source AI agent built for offensive security. Automated penetration testing from your terminal — plug in your Claude, GPT, or any LLM subscription and turn it into an autonomous red team agent with 13+ specialized agents, 7,600+ security skills, and 120+ OWASP test cases. 150+ AI providers • 5,300+ models • 56+ built in tools • 176+ MCP tools Quick Start • Intelligence Layer • What Makes It…
read the full CyberStrike overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agentic-Bug-Hunter or CyberStrike more popular?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,596 GitHub stars and CyberStrike has 3,374. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Agentic-Bug-Hunter and CyberStrike free?
Both are open source. Agentic-Bug-Hunter is licensed under MIT and CyberStrike under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Agentic-Bug-Hunter and CyberStrike?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python and CyberStrike in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Agentic-Bug-Hunter or CyberStrike?
Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if you want the larger community (5,596 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose CyberStrike if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.