head to head · open source
Agentic-Bug-Hunter vs code-on-incus
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,547 GitHub stars, 978 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. code-on-incus has 771 stars, 67 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Agentic-Bug-Hunter leads on adoption by 619% (5,547 vs 771 stars). Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python under MIT; code-on-incus is written in Go under MIT. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, code-on-incus 9%. code-on-incus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agentic-ai, claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Agentic-Bug-Hunter | code-on-incus | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.5K | ★ 771 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 978 | ⑂ 67 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Agentic-Bug-Hunter if
- You weight community size — 5.5K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick code-on-incus if
- You want the code-on-incus feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and code-on-incus fits your workflow better
About Agentic-Bug-Hunter
AI powered bug bounty hunting recon to report, in your terminal. Free Setup · Quick Start · Commands · What It Finds · Install · Support · FAQ Built and maintained by AwareXone · Website · X · GitHub Trusted By Engineers At Where this project's stargazers say they work. Compiled from public GitHub profiles of this repository's stargazers 43 people across 30 organizations, counted from the employer each person lists on their own profile or from their public organization memberships. No individual accounts are named. These companies have not endorsed or sponsored this project; their logos are shown as trademarks…
read the full Agentic-Bug-Hunter overview →
About code-on-incus
code on incus ( coi ) Give every AI coding agent its own machine with active defense. coi runs your AI coding tool (Claude Code, Codex, opencode, pi, omp) inside its own isolated Linux system a full OS container with root access, systemd, Docker, and the freedom to install anything. The agent works like it would on a real server but it can't touch your host, can't see your credentials, and if it does something dangerous, coi pauses or kills the container on its own. One command drops you into a coding session. Your project is mounted, file permissions just work, and your SSH keys, tokens, and environment…
read the full code-on-incus overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Agentic-Bug-Hunter or code-on-incus more popular?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter has 5,547 GitHub stars and code-on-incus has 771. Agentic-Bug-Hunter has the larger community by that measure.
Are Agentic-Bug-Hunter and code-on-incus free?
Both are open source. Agentic-Bug-Hunter is licensed under MIT and code-on-incus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Agentic-Bug-Hunter and code-on-incus?
Agentic-Bug-Hunter is written in Python and code-on-incus in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Agentic-Bug-Hunter or code-on-incus?
Choose Agentic-Bug-Hunter if you want the larger community (5,547 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose code-on-incus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.