head to head · open source
cve vs afrog
cve has 8,087 GitHub stars, 977 forks, 21 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. afrog has 4,419 stars, 483 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cve leads on adoption by 83% (8,087 vs 4,419 stars). cve is written in HTML under MIT; afrog is written in HTML under MIT. cve has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, afrog 11%. afrog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (penetration-testing, poc), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| cve | afrog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 8.1K | ★ 4.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | HTML | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-09-23 | 2026-09-23 |
| Forks | ⑂ 977 | ⑂ 483 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick cve if
- You weight community size — 8.1K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick afrog if
- You want the afrog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and afrog fits your workflow better
About cve
cve is an automatically generated, MIT licensed repository from Trickest that gathers almost every publicly available CVE Proof of Concept and publishes it as browsable markdown files, made for penetration testers, red teams and vulnerability researchers who need to find public exploits for a given identifier.
About afrog
afrog is an MIT licensed vulnerability scanner built for bug bounty, penetration testing and red teaming, aimed at testers who need fast verification of web targets and network services with low false positives.
read the full afrog overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Threat Detection & Response projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.
Frequently asked questions
Is cve or afrog more popular?
cve has 8,087 GitHub stars and afrog has 4,419. cve has the larger community by that measure.
Are cve and afrog free?
Both are open source. cve is licensed under MIT and afrog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between cve and afrog?
cve is written in HTML and afrog in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, cve or afrog?
Choose cve if you want the larger community (8,087 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose afrog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.