head to head · open source
actions-gh-pages vs Pagecord
actions-gh-pages has 5,371 GitHub stars, 447 forks, 95 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Pagecord has 194 stars, 16 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. actions-gh-pages leads on adoption by 2,669% (5,371 vs 194 stars). actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript under MIT; Pagecord is written in Ruby under a custom or non-standard licence. actions-gh-pages has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Pagecord 8%. Pagecord was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| actions-gh-pages | Pagecord | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.4K | ★ 194 |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 447 | ⑂ 16 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick actions-gh-pages if
- You weight community size — 5.4K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Pagecord if
- You want the Pagecord feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and Pagecord fits your workflow better
About actions-gh-pages
GitHub Pages Action [!NOTE] See also the GitHub official GitHub Pages Action first. GitHub Pages now uses Actions by default The GitHub Blog GitHub Pages: Custom GitHub Actions Workflows (beta) GitHub Changelog This is a GitHub Action to deploy your static files to GitHub Pages . This deploy action can be combined simply and freely with [Static Site Generators]. (Hugo, MkDocs, Gatsby, mdBook, Next, Nuxt, and so on.) [Static Site Generators]: The next example step will deploy ./public directory to the remote gh pages branch. For newbies of GitHub Actions: Note that the GITHUB TOKEN is NOT a personal access token…
read the full actions-gh-pages overview →
About Pagecord
Pagecord Blog without the slog. Say, what? Pagecord is a personal website and blogging platform. Simple to use, powerful under the hood. The stack Vanilla Rails (8), Hotwire, import maps, Postgres, Sidekiq, and Minitest with fixtures. Fat models, skinny controllers, RESTful routes. All that. The conventions the code follows are written down in AGENTS.md. Finding your way around architecture.md – how the app is shaped and hosted. docs/development.md – running it locally: Docker or native, processing emails, simulating billing, log analysis. docs/sysadmin/ – production operations notes. CONTRIBUTING.md Quick start…
read the full Pagecord overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Blogging & Personal Sites projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Blogging & Personal Sites field.
Frequently asked questions
Is actions-gh-pages or Pagecord more popular?
actions-gh-pages has 5,371 GitHub stars and Pagecord has 194. actions-gh-pages has the larger community by that measure.
Are actions-gh-pages and Pagecord free?
Both are open source. actions-gh-pages is licensed under MIT, and Pagecord has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between actions-gh-pages and Pagecord?
actions-gh-pages is written in TypeScript and Pagecord in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, actions-gh-pages or Pagecord?
Choose actions-gh-pages if you want the larger community (5,371 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Pagecord if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.