head to head · open source

Zitadel vs samlify

Zitadel has 15,060 GitHub stars, 1,317 forks, 1,171 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. samlify has 661 stars, 233 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Zitadel leads on adoption by 2,178% (15,060 vs 661 stars). Zitadel is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; samlify is written in TypeScript under MIT. Zitadel has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, samlify 35%. Zitadel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zitadel ★ 15K samlify ★ 661 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zitadel samlify
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 661
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-11
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 233
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zitadel if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zitadel profile →

pick samlify if

  • You want the samlify feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and samlify fits your workflow better

full samlify profile →

About Zitadel

Zitadel is an open source identity and access management platform written in Go and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It lives in the open source IAM ecosystem and provides identity infrastructure for developers who need to operate an authentication and authorization layer themselves.

read the full Zitadel overview →

About samlify

Node.js SAML 2.0 library for Single Sign On, written in TypeScript under the MIT licence, for developers adding SAML SSO to Node.js applications as either a Service Provider or an Identity Provider.

read the full samlify overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Zitadel vs Keycloak Zitadel vs JumpServer Zitadel vs Better Auth Zitadel vs authelia Zitadel vs Authentik Zitadel vs casbin Zitadel vs Sa-Token Zitadel vs hydra Zitadel vs SuperTokens Zitadel vs oauth2-proxy Zitadel vs Logto Zitadel vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is Zitadel or samlify more popular?

Zitadel has 15,060 GitHub stars and samlify has 661. Zitadel has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zitadel and samlify free?

Both are open source. Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and samlify under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zitadel and samlify?

Zitadel is written in Go and samlify in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zitadel or samlify?

Choose Zitadel if you want the larger community (15,060 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose samlify if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.