head to head · open source

Zitadel vs KeePassDX

Zitadel has 15,060 GitHub stars, 1,317 forks, 1,171 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. KeePassDX has 7,340 stars, 403 forks, 541 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Zitadel leads on adoption by 105% (15,060 vs 7,340 stars). Zitadel is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; KeePassDX is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. Zitadel has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, KeePassDX 5%. Zitadel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Zitadel ★ 15K KeePassDX ★ 7.3K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Zitadel KeePassDX
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 7.3K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 1.3K ⑂ 403
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Zitadel if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Zitadel profile →

pick KeePassDX if

  • You want the KeePassDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and KeePassDX fits your workflow better

full KeePassDX profile →

About Zitadel

Zitadel is an open source identity and access management platform written in Go and released under the AGPL 3.0 license. It lives in the open source IAM ecosystem and provides identity infrastructure for developers who need to operate an authentication and authorization layer themselves.

read the full Zitadel overview →

About KeePassDX

KeePassDX is a free, open source and ad free password and passkey manager for Android that keeps credentials in a single encrypted local database file in KeePass format and fills login forms through autofill and its own keyboard.

read the full KeePassDX overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Zitadel vs Keycloak Zitadel vs JumpServer Zitadel vs Better Auth Zitadel vs authelia Zitadel vs Authentik Zitadel vs casbin Zitadel vs Sa-Token Zitadel vs hydra Zitadel vs SuperTokens Zitadel vs oauth2-proxy Zitadel vs Logto Zitadel vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is Zitadel or KeePassDX more popular?

Zitadel has 15,060 GitHub stars and KeePassDX has 7,340. Zitadel has the larger community by that measure.

Are Zitadel and KeePassDX free?

Both are open source. Zitadel is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and KeePassDX under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Zitadel and KeePassDX?

Zitadel is written in Go and KeePassDX in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Zitadel or KeePassDX?

Choose Zitadel if you want the larger community (15,060 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose KeePassDX if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.