head to head · open source

wiki vs simba

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped today. simba has 1,541 stars, 114 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. wiki leads on adoption by 1,778% (28,938 vs 1,541 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; simba is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, simba 7%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K simba ★ 1.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki simba
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 1.5K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Vue TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-06-18
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 114
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick simba if

  • You want the simba feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and simba fits your workflow better

full simba profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About simba

High Efficiency Customer Service Assistant See how easy it is to integrate Simba into your website What is Simba? Simba is an open source customer service assistant built for teams who need full control over their AI. Unlike black box solutions, Simba is designed from the ground up around evaluation and customization , so you can measure performance, iterate fast, and tailor the assistant to your exact needs. Why Simba? Key Features Evaluation First Design Track retrieval accuracy, generation quality, and latency out of the box. Know exactly how your assistant performs. Fully Customizable Swap embedding models, L…

read the full simba overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or simba more popular?

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars and simba has 1,541. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and simba free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and simba under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and simba?

wiki is written in Vue and simba in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or simba?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,938 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose simba if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.