head to head · open source

wiki vs persepolis

wiki has 28,937 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. persepolis has 7,453 stars, 708 forks, 317 open issues and last shipped 11 months ago. wiki leads on adoption by 288% (28,937 vs 7,453 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; persepolis is written in Python under GPL-3.0. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, persepolis 9%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K persepolis ★ 7.5K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki persepolis
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 7.5K
License AGPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Vue Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2025-10-09
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 708
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick persepolis if

  • You want the persepolis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and persepolis fits your workflow better

full persepolis profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About persepolis

Persepolis is a download manager written in Python and released under the GPL 3.0 license. It ships a graphical interface built with PyQt5 or PySide6 and is developed for GNU/Linux distributions, the BSDs, macOS, and Microsoft Windows. The project has existed for roughly ten years, carries 7,449 stars and 709 forks on GitHub, and uses the Meson build system. It is packaged for Arch Linux through the persepolis git AUR package, and it belongs to the desktop application ecosystem of Python and Qt rather than to any single distribution.

read the full persepolis overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or persepolis more popular?

wiki has 28,937 GitHub stars and persepolis has 7,453. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and persepolis free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and persepolis under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and persepolis?

wiki is written in Vue and persepolis in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or persepolis?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,937 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose persepolis if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.