head to head · open source

wiki vs huma

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped today. huma has 4,402 stars, 285 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 25 days ago. wiki leads on adoption by 557% (28,938 vs 4,402 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; huma is written in Go under MIT. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, huma 6%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (documentation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K huma ★ 4.4K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki huma
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 4.4K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Vue Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-24
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 285
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick huma if

  • You want the huma feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and huma fits your workflow better

full huma profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About huma

Huma is an MIT licensed Go micro framework for building HTTP REST and RPC APIs backed by OpenAPI 3.1 and JSON Schema, aimed at Go developers and teams that want generated, always current API documentation without abandoning their existing router, middleware, or logging stack.

read the full huma overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or huma more popular?

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars and huma has 4,402. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and huma free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and huma under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and huma?

wiki is written in Vue and huma in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or huma?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,938 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose huma if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.