head to head · open source

wiki vs Fumadocs

wiki has 28,937 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fumadocs has 13,171 stars, 730 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. wiki leads on adoption by 120% (28,937 vs 13,171 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; Fumadocs is written in TypeScript under MIT. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Fumadocs 6%. Fumadocs was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K Fumadocs ★ 13K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki Fumadocs
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 13K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Vue TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 730
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick Fumadocs if

  • You want the Fumadocs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Fumadocs fits your workflow better

full Fumadocs profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About Fumadocs

Fumadocs is a documentation framework for React.js and Astro. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. The project targets documentation websites. It lives in the React.js and Astro documentation ecosystem. The supplied registry category is Content & Publishing / Documentation & Knowledge Base. The supplied repository metadata lists 13,134 stars and 728 forks. The supplied repository age is 0 years, and the last push timestamp is 2026 09 14T12:45:01Z.

read the full Fumadocs overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or Fumadocs more popular?

wiki has 28,937 GitHub stars and Fumadocs has 13,171. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and Fumadocs free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Fumadocs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and Fumadocs?

wiki is written in Vue and Fumadocs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or Fumadocs?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,937 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Fumadocs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.