head to head · open source

wiki vs ctx

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars, 3,314 forks, 182 open issues and last shipped today. ctx has 587 stars, 71 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 18 days ago. wiki leads on adoption by 4,830% (28,938 vs 587 stars). wiki is written in Vue under AGPL-3.0; ctx is written in Python under MIT. wiki has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ctx 12%. wiki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wiki ★ 29K ctx ★ 587 category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

wiki ctx
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 587
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Vue Python
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-08-31
Forks ⑂ 3.3K ⑂ 71
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wiki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Vue
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wiki profile →

pick ctx if

  • You want the ctx feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ctx fits your workflow better

full ctx profile →

About wiki

Wiki.js is a modern, lightweight wiki application built on NodeJS and distributed as open source under the AGPL 3.0 licence, aimed at teams and organisations that want to publish and maintain their own documentation and knowledge base rather than renting a hosted one.

read the full wiki overview →

About ctx

ctx Find the cheapest AI coding setup that actually works on your repo. CTX Fit analyzes your repository, tests promising AI coding configurations against real tasks in it, and produces the winning configuration as a reviewable change — in your working tree with apply , or as a pull request with pr . It picks the cheapest setup that reliably works — reliability is a requirement, not a tie break — and if nothing beats what you already have, it says so. The winner is chosen by a fixed rule, not a score: discard every candidate below the reliability floor, then minimize attributable cost, then break ties toward the …

read the full ctx overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

storybook vs wiki understand-anything vs wiki storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

wiki vs storybook wiki vs Understand-Anything wiki vs devdocs wiki vs docsify wiki vs mkdocs-material wiki vs BookStack wiki vs deepwiki-open wiki vs Docs wiki vs jsdoc wiki vs Skill_Seekers wiki vs gollum wiki vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is wiki or ctx more popular?

wiki has 28,938 GitHub stars and ctx has 587. wiki has the larger community by that measure.

Are wiki and ctx free?

Both are open source. wiki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and ctx under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wiki and ctx?

wiki is written in Vue and ctx in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wiki or ctx?

Choose wiki if you want the larger community (28,938 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ctx if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.