head to head · open source

wexflow vs redun

wexflow has 842 GitHub stars, 189 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. redun has 602 stars, 52 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. wexflow leads on adoption by 40% (842 vs 602 stars). wexflow is written in C# under MIT; redun is written in Python under Apache-2.0. wexflow has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, redun 9%. wexflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (etl, workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

wexflow ★ 842 redun ★ 602 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

wexflow redun
GitHub stars ★ 842 ★ 602
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C# Python
Last push 2026-09-11 2026-07-17
Forks ⑂ 189 ⑂ 52
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick wexflow if

  • You weight community size — 842 stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full wexflow profile →

pick redun if

  • You want the redun feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and redun fits your workflow better

full redun profile →

About wexflow

Wexflow is an open source, cross platform workflow automation engine written in C for developers and technical users who need to automate file operations, system processes, scripting, networking, scheduling and alerts instead of maintaining that plumbing by hand.

read the full wexflow overview →

About redun

redun is an open source Python workflow engine, licensed Apache 2.0, for data engineers, data scientists, bioinformatics and cheminformatics teams who want to express workflows as code rather than as static dataflow graphs.

read the full redun overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 115K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

airbyte vs cube airbyte vs shardingsphere cube vs shardingsphere airbyte vs debezium cube vs debezium shardingsphere vs debezium airbyte vs cocoindex cube vs cocoindex firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Data Engineering & Integration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Engineering & Integration field.

wexflow vs Airbyte wexflow vs Cube wexflow vs shardingsphere wexflow vs debezium wexflow vs CocoIndex wexflow vs seatunnel wexflow vs steampipe wexflow vs realtime wexflow vs CloudQuery wexflow vs flink-cdc wexflow vs Lightdash wexflow vs fluvio

Frequently asked questions

Is wexflow or redun more popular?

wexflow has 842 GitHub stars and redun has 602. wexflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are wexflow and redun free?

Both are open source. wexflow is licensed under MIT and redun under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between wexflow and redun?

wexflow is written in C# and redun in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, wexflow or redun?

Choose wexflow if you want the larger community (842 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose redun if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.