head to head · open source

webpack vs cuber-gem

webpack has 65,945 GitHub stars, 9,545 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cuber-gem has 713 stars, 27 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. webpack leads on adoption by 9,149% (65,945 vs 713 stars). webpack is written in JavaScript under MIT; cuber-gem is written in Ruby under Apache-2.0. webpack has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, cuber-gem 4%. webpack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

webpack ★ 66K cuber-gem ★ 713 category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

webpack cuber-gem
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 713
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Ruby
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-04-12
Forks ⑂ 9.5K ⑂ 27
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick webpack if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full webpack profile →

pick cuber-gem if

  • You want the cuber-gem feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You evaluated both and cuber-gem fits your workflow better

full cuber-gem profile →

About webpack

webpack is an open source module bundler for JavaScript and related assets, distributed under the MIT license and published to npm. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem, where the README describes its main purpose as bundling JavaScript files for use in a browser, while also being capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset. Loaders let modules arrive in many forms — CommonJS, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, images, JSON, CoffeeScript, LESS, or custom formats — and the plugin system extends what the build can do.

read the full webpack overview →

About cuber-gem

Cuber is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Ruby based automation tool that packages and deploys applications written in any language or framework onto Kubernetes from a roughly ten line Cuberfile and a single cuber deploy command, aimed at developers and small teams who want the simplicity of a platform as a service without its cost or provider lock in.

read the full cuber-gem overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

vite vs webpack webpack vs appwrite vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel vite vs harness vite vs dokku vite vs turborepo vite vs nx opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

webpack vs vite webpack vs Appwrite webpack vs parcel webpack vs Harness webpack vs Dokku webpack vs turborepo webpack vs nx webpack vs NocoBase webpack vs gradle webpack vs rspack webpack vs devbox webpack vs xmake

Frequently asked questions

Is webpack or cuber-gem more popular?

webpack has 65,945 GitHub stars and cuber-gem has 713. webpack has the larger community by that measure.

Are webpack and cuber-gem free?

Both are open source. webpack is licensed under MIT and cuber-gem under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between webpack and cuber-gem?

webpack is written in JavaScript and cuber-gem in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, webpack or cuber-gem?

Choose webpack if you want the larger community (65,945 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cuber-gem if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.