head to head · open source
webpack vs Ceedling
webpack has 65,945 GitHub stars, 9,545 forks, 123 open issues and last shipped today. Ceedling has 851 stars, 273 forks, 248 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webpack leads on adoption by 7,649% (65,945 vs 851 stars). webpack is written in JavaScript under MIT; Ceedling is written in Ruby under MIT. webpack has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, Ceedling 32%. webpack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (build-tool), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| webpack | Ceedling | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 66K | ★ 851 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | Ruby |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.5K | ⑂ 273 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick webpack if
- You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Ceedling if
- You want the Ceedling feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You evaluated both and Ceedling fits your workflow better
About webpack
webpack is an open source module bundler for JavaScript and related assets, distributed under the MIT license and published to npm. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem, where the README describes its main purpose as bundling JavaScript files for use in a browser, while also being capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset. Loaders let modules arrive in many forms — CommonJS, AMD, ES6 modules, CSS, images, JSON, CoffeeScript, LESS, or custom formats — and the plugin system extends what the build can do.
read the full webpack overview →
About Ceedling
Ceedling ======== Ceedling 1.1.8 is the latest and greatest. See [ Release Notes ][release notes], Changelog , [ Breaking Changes ][breaking changes], and [ Known Issues ][known issues]. See 🚀 Getting Started for installation and new project set up. New goodies in 1.1.x: A [Partial][partials docs] allows a test to mix mocked and real functions from the same source module in a single test file and enables testing of static and inline functions without modifying source code. Ceedling is now complemented by a full, searchable [documentation site][ceedling docs site] available both online and as a local bundle expor…
read the full Ceedling overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Build & Deployment projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.
Frequently asked questions
Is webpack or Ceedling more popular?
webpack has 65,945 GitHub stars and Ceedling has 851. webpack has the larger community by that measure.
Are webpack and Ceedling free?
Both are open source. webpack is licensed under MIT and Ceedling under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between webpack and Ceedling?
webpack is written in JavaScript and Ceedling in Ruby. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, webpack or Ceedling?
Choose webpack if you want the larger community (65,945 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Ceedling if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.