head to head · open source

gs-quant vs UTMStack

gs-quant has 12,986 GitHub stars, 1,750 forks, 73 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. UTMStack has 582 stars, 76 forks, 141 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gs-quant leads on adoption by 2,131% (12,986 vs 582 stars). gs-quant is written in Python under Apache-2.0; UTMStack is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0. gs-quant has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, UTMStack 13%. UTMStack was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gs-quant ★ 13K UTMStack ★ 582 category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gs-quant UTMStack
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 582
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 76
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gs-quant if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gs-quant profile →

pick UTMStack if

  • You want the UTMStack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and UTMStack fits your workflow better

full UTMStack profile →

About gs-quant

GS Quant is an Apache 2.0 Python toolkit for quantitative finance, maintained by quantitative developers at Goldman Sachs, and it is intended for quants and institutional clients of the bank who build derivative pricing, trading strategy and risk management workflows on top of Goldman Sachs' risk transfer platform.

read the full gs-quant overview →

About UTMStack

UTMStack is an open source, AGPL 3.0 unified threat management platform that merges SIEM and XDR into one system, built for security operations centre teams, incident responders and compliance owners who need real time log correlation, threat detection and audit evidence without handing their telemetry to a closed vendor.

read the full UTMStack overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

gs-quant vs lighthouse gs-quant vs teleport gs-quant vs lynis gs-quant vs prowler gs-quant vs opa gs-quant vs Amphion gs-quant vs checkov gs-quant vs kyverno gs-quant vs aircrack-ng gs-quant vs tfsec gs-quant vs rundeck gs-quant vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is gs-quant or UTMStack more popular?

gs-quant has 12,986 GitHub stars and UTMStack has 582. gs-quant has the larger community by that measure.

Are gs-quant and UTMStack free?

Both are open source. gs-quant is licensed under Apache-2.0 and UTMStack under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gs-quant and UTMStack?

gs-quant is written in Python and UTMStack in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gs-quant or UTMStack?

Choose gs-quant if you want the larger community (12,986 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose UTMStack if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.