head to head · open source

Umami vs InsightFlare

Umami has 38,981 GitHub stars, 8,107 forks, 127 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. InsightFlare has 501 stars, 13 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Umami leads on adoption by 7,681% (38,981 vs 501 stars). Umami is written in TypeScript under MIT; InsightFlare is written in TypeScript under MIT. Umami has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, InsightFlare 3%. Umami was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Umami ★ 39K InsightFlare ★ 501 category Data & Analytics

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Umami InsightFlare
GitHub stars ★ 39K ★ 501
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-23 2026-09-23
Forks ⑂ 8.1K ⑂ 13
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Umami if

  • You weight community size — 39K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Umami profile →

pick InsightFlare if

  • You want the InsightFlare feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and InsightFlare fits your workflow better

full InsightFlare profile →

About Umami

Umami is a privacy first, open source web and product analytics platform that gives site owners and product teams traffic, campaign, behavior, conversion and revenue reporting without cookies or surveillance, run either self hosted or in the cloud.

read the full Umami overview →

About InsightFlare

InsightFlare is an MIT licensed, privacy friendly web analytics tool written in TypeScript that runs entirely on Cloudflare's edge platform, built for site owners and product teams who want cookieless, GDPR compliant traffic reporting without operating analytics infrastructure of their own.

read the full InsightFlare overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Browser Use ★ 116K Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 83K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K

Related comparisons

posthog vs umami umami vs plausible umami vs matomo grafana vs posthog sentry vs posthog posthog vs plausible posthog vs matomo posthog vs rybbit firecrawl vs scrapy firecrawl vs crawlee browser-use vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapling playwright vs crawl4ai browser-use vs scrapy playwright vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapling godot vs pixijs mermaid vs apache-superset three-js vs pixijs supabase vs metabase mermaid vs echarts grafana vs apache-superset apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase

More Web & Product Analytics projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.

Umami vs PostHog Umami vs Plausible Umami vs Matomo Umami vs Rybbit Umami vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor Umami vs Fathom Lite Umami vs firebase-ios-sdk Umami vs Countly Umami vs shynet Umami vs tianji Umami vs OpenWebAnalytics Umami vs talivia

Frequently asked questions

Is Umami or InsightFlare more popular?

Umami has 38,981 GitHub stars and InsightFlare has 501. Umami has the larger community by that measure.

Are Umami and InsightFlare free?

Both are open source. Umami is licensed under MIT and InsightFlare under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Umami and InsightFlare?

Umami is written in TypeScript and InsightFlare in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Umami or InsightFlare?

Choose Umami if you want the larger community (38,981 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose InsightFlare if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.