head to head · open source

typedb vs schemaspy

typedb has 4,458 GitHub stars, 375 forks, 310 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. schemaspy has 3,724 stars, 357 forks, 303 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. typedb leads on adoption by 20% (4,458 vs 3,724 stars). typedb is written in Rust under MPL-2.0; schemaspy is written in HTML under LGPL-3.0. typedb has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, schemaspy 10%. typedb was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (database), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

typedb ★ 4.5K schemaspy ★ 3.7K category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

typedb schemaspy
GitHub stars ★ 4.5K ★ 3.7K
License MPL-2.0 LGPL-3.0
Written in Rust HTML
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-03-05
Forks ⑂ 375 ⑂ 357
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick typedb if

  • You weight community size — 4.5K stars and counting
  • You want the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full typedb profile →

pick schemaspy if

  • You want the schemaspy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the LGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches HTML
  • You evaluated both and schemaspy fits your workflow better

full schemaspy profile →

About typedb

TypeDB is an open source database project written in Rust and licensed under MPL 2.0. It lives in the database and knowledge representation ecosystem, and its registry category covers content, documentation, and knowledge bases. The project introduces TypeQL as its query language and targets nested, interconnected data expressed through a strongly typed schema rather than only through tables, documents, or graph edges.

read the full typedb overview →

About schemaspy

SchemaSpy is a standalone Java based database metadata analyzer that reverse engineers an existing database schema and produces a browsable HTML report with entity relationship diagrams, for database administrators and developers who need to understand a data model they did not design.

read the full schemaspy overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

playwright vs storybook storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify react vs next-js react vs nuxt next-js vs vite next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo supabase vs strapi hugo vs strapi hugo vs jekyll hugo vs payload hugo vs halo strapi vs ghost hugo vs filament strapi vs payload

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

typedb vs storybook typedb vs Understand-Anything typedb vs devdocs typedb vs docsify typedb vs wiki typedb vs mkdocs-material typedb vs BookStack typedb vs deepwiki-open typedb vs Docs typedb vs jsdoc typedb vs Skill_Seekers typedb vs gollum

Frequently asked questions

Is typedb or schemaspy more popular?

typedb has 4,458 GitHub stars and schemaspy has 3,724. typedb has the larger community by that measure.

Are typedb and schemaspy free?

Both are open source. typedb is licensed under MPL-2.0 and schemaspy under LGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between typedb and schemaspy?

typedb is written in Rust and schemaspy in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, typedb or schemaspy?

Choose typedb if you want the larger community (4,458 stars) or its MPL-2.0 licence terms. Choose schemaspy if its feature set, stack or LGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.