head to head · open source

trino vs Kutt

trino has 13,257 GitHub stars, 3,779 forks, 2,764 open issues and last shipped today. Kutt has 11,110 stars, 1,510 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. trino leads on adoption by 19% (13,257 vs 11,110 stars). trino is written in Java under Apache-2.0; Kutt is written in JavaScript under MIT. trino has attracted 29% as many forks as stars, Kutt 14%. trino was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

trino ★ 13K Kutt ★ 11K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

trino Kutt
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 11K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick trino if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full trino profile →

pick Kutt if

  • You want the Kutt feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Kutt fits your workflow better

full Kutt profile →

About trino

Trino is a distributed SQL query engine for big data analytics, published as the official Apache 2.0 licensed Java repository of the project formerly known as PrestoSQL, and it is aimed at teams that need to query data spread across Hadoop, Hive, Iceberg, Delta Lake and other large scale sources through a single SQL interface.

read the full trino overview →

About Kutt

Kutt is a free, MIT licensed, self hosted URL shortener written in JavaScript for individuals, teams, and organisations that want branded short links on their own infrastructure rather than a rented hosted service.

read the full Kutt overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs mysql opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

trino vs duckdb trino vs Krayin trino vs Listmonk trino vs goaccess trino vs excelize trino vs claude-seo trino vs Billion Mail trino vs BillionMail trino vs dbt trino vs starrocks trino vs perspective trino vs Mautic

Frequently asked questions

Is trino or Kutt more popular?

trino has 13,257 GitHub stars and Kutt has 11,110. trino has the larger community by that measure.

Are trino and Kutt free?

Both are open source. trino is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Kutt under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between trino and Kutt?

trino is written in Java and Kutt in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, trino or Kutt?

Choose trino if you want the larger community (13,257 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Kutt if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.