head to head · open source

trino vs clickvisual

trino has 13,257 GitHub stars, 3,779 forks, 2,764 open issues and last shipped today. clickvisual has 1,643 stars, 238 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. trino leads on adoption by 707% (13,257 vs 1,643 stars). trino is written in Java under Apache-2.0; clickvisual is written in Go under MIT. trino has attracted 29% as many forks as stars, clickvisual 14%. trino was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

trino ★ 13K clickvisual ★ 1.6K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

trino clickvisual
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.8K ⑂ 238
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick trino if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full trino profile →

pick clickvisual if

  • You want the clickvisual feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and clickvisual fits your workflow better

full clickvisual profile →

About trino

Trino is a distributed SQL query engine for big data analytics, published as the official Apache 2.0 licensed Java repository of the project formerly known as PrestoSQL, and it is aimed at teams that need to query data spread across Hadoop, Hive, Iceberg, Delta Lake and other large scale sources through a single SQL interface.

read the full trino overview →

About clickvisual

ClickVisual is a lightweight, browser based log analytics and log search platform for ClickHouse, aimed at teams that already store their logs in ClickHouse and want querying, dashboards, and alerting without operating a full Elasticsearch stack.

read the full clickvisual overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs mysql opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

trino vs duckdb trino vs Krayin trino vs Listmonk trino vs goaccess trino vs excelize trino vs claude-seo trino vs Billion Mail trino vs BillionMail trino vs dbt trino vs starrocks trino vs perspective trino vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is trino or clickvisual more popular?

trino has 13,257 GitHub stars and clickvisual has 1,643. trino has the larger community by that measure.

Are trino and clickvisual free?

Both are open source. trino is licensed under Apache-2.0 and clickvisual under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between trino and clickvisual?

trino is written in Java and clickvisual in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, trino or clickvisual?

Choose trino if you want the larger community (13,257 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose clickvisual if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.