head to head · open source

ToolJet vs Rowy

ToolJet has 40,936 GitHub stars, 5,448 forks, 1,204 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Rowy has 6,840 stars, 557 forks, 80 open issues and last shipped 1.8 years ago. ToolJet leads on adoption by 498% (40,936 vs 6,840 stars). ToolJet is written in JavaScript under AGPL-3.0; Rowy is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. ToolJet has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Rowy 8%. ToolJet was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (internal-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ToolJet ★ 41K Rowy ★ 6.8K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

ToolJet Rowy
GitHub stars ★ 41K ★ 6.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2024-11-23
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 557
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ToolJet if

  • You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ToolJet profile →

pick Rowy if

  • You want the Rowy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Rowy fits your workflow better

full Rowy profile →

About ToolJet

ToolJet is an open source low code platform for building internal tools—admin panels, dashboards, and operational applications—by connecting to existing databases, APIs, and SaaS systems. It lives in the JavaScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full ToolJet overview →

About Rowy

Rowy is an open source low code backend platform that runs in the browser. It provides a spreadsheet like interface for managing data stored in Firestore, and it embeds a code editor for writing cloud functions in JavaScript or TypeScript. The project lives in the Firebase and Google Cloud Platform ecosystem, and it is written in TypeScript. It is commonly described as an Airtable style front end for a Firestore database, with automation built in.

read the full Rowy overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

langflow vs tooljet langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ToolJet vs Langflow ToolJet vs Supabase ToolJet vs PocketBase ToolJet vs AppSmith ToolJet vs TipTap ToolJet vs Directus ToolJet vs Budibase ToolJet vs Onlook ToolJet vs Teable ToolJet vs Convex ToolJet vs Alokai ToolJet vs KeystoneJS

Frequently asked questions

Is ToolJet or Rowy more popular?

ToolJet has 40,936 GitHub stars and Rowy has 6,840. ToolJet has the larger community by that measure.

Are ToolJet and Rowy free?

Both are open source. ToolJet is licensed under AGPL-3.0, and Rowy has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ToolJet and Rowy?

ToolJet is written in JavaScript and Rowy in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ToolJet or Rowy?

Choose ToolJet if you want the larger community (40,936 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Rowy if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.