head to head · open source

Tongsuo vs routinator

Tongsuo has 1,536 GitHub stars, 260 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. routinator has 573 stars, 86 forks, 34 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Tongsuo leads on adoption by 168% (1,536 vs 573 stars). Tongsuo is written in C under Apache-2.0; routinator is written in Rust under BSD-3-Clause. Tongsuo has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, routinator 15%. routinator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cryptography, pki), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Tongsuo ★ 1.5K routinator ★ 573 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Tongsuo routinator
GitHub stars ★ 1.5K ★ 573
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in C Rust
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 260 ⑂ 86
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Tongsuo if

  • You weight community size — 1.5K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Tongsuo profile →

pick routinator if

  • You want the routinator feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and routinator fits your workflow better

full routinator profile →

About Tongsuo

Tongsuo (铜锁) is an open source C library of modern cryptographic primitives and secure communication protocols, developed under the OpenAtom Foundation, and it is built for teams that need Chinese commercial cryptography, TLS, PKI, and privacy preserving primitives from a single dependency.

read the full Tongsuo overview →

About routinator

Routinator 3000 is a free, open source RPKI Relying Party written in Rust that validates RPKI data and serves it to routers, aimed at network operators and engineers running BGP who need to check route origin authorisations.

read the full routinator overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Data Security & Privacy projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Security & Privacy field.

Tongsuo vs Puter Tongsuo vs Mattermost Tongsuo vs Signal Tongsuo vs Ente Tongsuo vs Element Tongsuo vs Fluxer Tongsuo vs certificates Tongsuo vs Tuta Tongsuo vs Zen Tongsuo vs Cinny Tongsuo vs Certipy Tongsuo vs Stoat

Frequently asked questions

Is Tongsuo or routinator more popular?

Tongsuo has 1,536 GitHub stars and routinator has 573. Tongsuo has the larger community by that measure.

Are Tongsuo and routinator free?

Both are open source. Tongsuo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and routinator under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Tongsuo and routinator?

Tongsuo is written in C and routinator in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Tongsuo or routinator?

Choose Tongsuo if you want the larger community (1,536 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose routinator if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.