head to head · open source

thc-hydra vs inql

thc-hydra has 12,492 GitHub stars, 2,708 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. inql has 1,814 stars, 190 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. thc-hydra leads on adoption by 589% (12,492 vs 1,814 stars). thc-hydra is written in C under AGPL-3.0; inql is written in Kotlin under Apache-2.0. thc-hydra has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, inql 10%. inql was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

thc-hydra ★ 12K inql ★ 1.8K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

thc-hydra inql
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 1.8K
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in C Kotlin
Last push 2026-11-08 2026-11-10
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 190
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick thc-hydra if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full thc-hydra profile →

pick inql if

  • You want the inql feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and inql fits your workflow better

full inql profile →

About thc-hydra

H Y D R A (c) 2001 2023 by van Hauser / THC Many modules were written by David (dot) Maciejak @ gmail (dot) com BFG code by Jan Dlabal Licensed under AGPLv3 (see LICENSE file) Please do not use in military or secret service organizations, or for illegal purposes. (This is the wish of the author and non binding. Many people working in these organizations do not care for laws and ethics anyway. You are not one of the "good" ones if you ignore this.) NOTE: No, this is not meant to be a markdown doc! old school! Hydra in the most current GitHub state can be directly downloaded via Docker: INTRODUCTION Number one of…

read the full thc-hydra overview →

About inql

InQL v6.1.2 Burp Extension for Advanced GraphQL Testing :rocket: Introduction Welcome to InQL, an open source GraphQL testing tool. This tool provides features designed to enhance your GraphQL testing experience, making it more efficient and effective. We appreciate your trust in InQL. Happy testing! :star2: Key Features The InQL user interface is equipped with three primary components: the Scanner , the Batch Queries , and the Engine Fingerprinting tab :mag right: Scanner The Scanner is the core of InQL, where you can analyze a GraphQL endpoint or a local introspection schema file. It auto generates all…

read the full inql overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Frequently asked questions

Is thc-hydra or inql more popular?

thc-hydra has 12,492 GitHub stars and inql has 1,814. thc-hydra has the larger community by that measure.

Are thc-hydra and inql free?

Both are open source. thc-hydra is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and inql under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between thc-hydra and inql?

thc-hydra is written in C and inql in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, thc-hydra or inql?

Choose thc-hydra if you want the larger community (12,492 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose inql if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.