head to head · open source

thc-hydra vs cameradar

thc-hydra has 12,507 GitHub stars, 2,714 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. cameradar has 5,337 stars, 658 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped yesterday. thc-hydra leads on adoption by 134% (12,507 vs 5,337 stars). thc-hydra is written in C under AGPL-3.0; cameradar is written in Go under MIT. thc-hydra has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, cameradar 12%. cameradar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

thc-hydra ★ 13K cameradar ★ 5.3K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

thc-hydra cameradar
GitHub stars ★ 13K ★ 5.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in C Go
Last push 2026-11-08 2026-11-14
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 658
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick thc-hydra if

  • You weight community size — 13K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full thc-hydra profile →

pick cameradar if

  • You want the cameradar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cameradar fits your workflow better

full cameradar profile →

About thc-hydra

H Y D R A (c) 2001 2023 by van Hauser / THC Many modules were written by David (dot) Maciejak @ gmail (dot) com BFG code by Jan Dlabal Licensed under AGPLv3 (see LICENSE file) Please do not use in military or secret service organizations, or for illegal purposes. (This is the wish of the author and non binding. Many people working in these organizations do not care for laws and ethics anyway. You are not one of the "good" ones if you ignore this.) NOTE: No, this is not meant to be a markdown doc! old school! Hydra in the most current GitHub state can be directly downloaded via Docker: INTRODUCTION Number one of…

read the full thc-hydra overview →

About cameradar

Cameradar RTSP stream access tool Cameradar scans RTSP endpoints on authorized targets, and uses dictionary attacks to bruteforce their credentials and routes. What Cameradar does Detects open RTSP hosts on accessible targets. Detects the device model that streams the RTSP feed. Attempts dictionary based discovery of stream routes (for example, /live.sdp ). Attempts dictionary based discovery of camera credentials. Produces a report of findings. Table of contents Quick start with Docker Install the binary Install on Android (Termux) Configuration Security and responsible use Output Check camera access Command…

read the full cameradar overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

Frequently asked questions

Is thc-hydra or cameradar more popular?

thc-hydra has 12,507 GitHub stars and cameradar has 5,337. thc-hydra has the larger community by that measure.

Are thc-hydra and cameradar free?

Both are open source. thc-hydra is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cameradar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between thc-hydra and cameradar?

thc-hydra is written in C and cameradar in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, thc-hydra or cameradar?

Choose thc-hydra if you want the larger community (12,507 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cameradar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.