head to head · open source

thc-hydra vs cameradar

thc-hydra has 12,333 GitHub stars, 2,676 forks, 50 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. cameradar has 5,234 stars, 644 forks, 22 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. thc-hydra leads on adoption by 136% (12,333 vs 5,234 stars). thc-hydra is written in C under AGPL-3.0; cameradar is written in Go under MIT. thc-hydra has attracted 22% as many forks as stars, cameradar 12%. cameradar was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (penetration-testing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

thc-hydra ★ 12K cameradar ★ 5.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

thc-hydra cameradar
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 5.2K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in C Go
Last push 2026-07-30 2026-09-29
Forks ⑂ 2.7K ⑂ 644
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick thc-hydra if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full thc-hydra profile →

pick cameradar if

  • You want the cameradar feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cameradar fits your workflow better

full cameradar profile →

About thc-hydra

Hydra is an AGPL 3.0 licensed, C based login cracker that attacks dozens of network protocols in parallel, built for security researchers and penetration testing consultants who need to demonstrate how easily a remote system can be reached with weak credentials.

read the full thc-hydra overview →

About cameradar

Cameradar is a Go based security tool for pentesters and infosec teams that scans authorized networks for open RTSP video surveillance cameras and uses dictionary attacks to recover their stream routes and credentials.

read the full cameradar overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault

More Threat Detection & Response projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Threat Detection & Response field.

thc-hydra vs PayloadsAllTheThings thc-hydra vs Anthropic-Cybersecurity-Skills thc-hydra vs ProjectDiscovery thc-hydra vs pentagi thc-hydra vs PentestGPT thc-hydra vs crowdsec thc-hydra vs Osintgram thc-hydra vs vuls thc-hydra vs osv-scanner thc-hydra vs rengine thc-hydra vs reconftw thc-hydra vs cve

Frequently asked questions

Is thc-hydra or cameradar more popular?

thc-hydra has 12,333 GitHub stars and cameradar has 5,234. thc-hydra has the larger community by that measure.

Are thc-hydra and cameradar free?

Both are open source. thc-hydra is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and cameradar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between thc-hydra and cameradar?

thc-hydra is written in C and cameradar in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, thc-hydra or cameradar?

Choose thc-hydra if you want the larger community (12,333 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose cameradar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.