head to head · open source
Strapi vs strapi-tool-dockerize
Strapi has 73,425 GitHub stars, 10,050 forks, 558 open issues and last shipped yesterday. strapi-tool-dockerize has 622 stars, 37 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Strapi leads on adoption by 11,705% (73,425 vs 622 stars). Strapi is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; strapi-tool-dockerize is written in JavaScript under MIT. Strapi has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, strapi-tool-dockerize 6%. Strapi was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (hacktoberfest), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Strapi | strapi-tool-dockerize | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 73K | ★ 622 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-09 |
| Forks | ⑂ 10K | ⑂ 37 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Strapi if
- You weight community size — 73K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick strapi-tool-dockerize if
- You want the strapi-tool-dockerize feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and strapi-tool-dockerize fits your workflow better
About Strapi
Open source headless CMS, self hosted or Cloud you're in control. The leading open source headless CMS, 100% JavaScript/TypeScript, flexible and fully customizable. Docs · Strapi Cloud · Roadmap · Discord · Discussions Strapi is an open source, self hosted headless CMS that lets developers build content APIs fast while giving content creators a friendly editing interface. Define your content models and Strapi generates a full API, ready to consume from any frontend, mobile app, or IoT device. Design content structures visually with the Content Type Builder , no code required Auto generated REST & GraphQL APIs…
read the full Strapi overview →
About strapi-tool-dockerize
@Strapi community/dockerize Add docker support for a Strapi Project with ease 🚀 Feel free to buy @Eventyret a ☕️ if this tool was helpful Open Collective Table of Contents 🚦 Current Status ✨ Usage 🤖 Using CLI Arguments 🧹 Resetting project 🚀 Features 🐳 Docker compose support 🎗 Contributing ⭐️ Show your support 🔗 Links 🌎 Community support 🙋♀️ Authors 🙋♂️ Contributors (Thank you 🙏) 🔖 License 🚦 Current Status This package is currently under development and should be consider STABLE in terms of state. I/We are currently accepting contributions and/or dedicated contributors to help develop and maintain…
read the full strapi-tool-dockerize overview →
More in Content & Publishing
Related comparisons
More Content Management Systems (CMS) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Content Management Systems (CMS) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Strapi or strapi-tool-dockerize more popular?
Strapi has 73,425 GitHub stars and strapi-tool-dockerize has 622. Strapi has the larger community by that measure.
Are Strapi and strapi-tool-dockerize free?
Both are open source. Strapi has no licence declared in this registry, and strapi-tool-dockerize is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Strapi and strapi-tool-dockerize?
Strapi is written in TypeScript and strapi-tool-dockerize in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Strapi or strapi-tool-dockerize?
Choose Strapi if you want the larger community (73,425 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose strapi-tool-dockerize if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.