head to head · open source

storybook vs Fumadocs

storybook has 91,081 GitHub stars, 10,452 forks, 1,831 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Fumadocs has 13,171 stars, 730 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. storybook leads on adoption by 592% (91,081 vs 13,171 stars). storybook is written in TypeScript under MIT; Fumadocs is written in TypeScript under MIT. storybook has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, Fumadocs 6%. storybook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

storybook ★ 91K Fumadocs ★ 13K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

storybook Fumadocs
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 10K ⑂ 730
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick storybook if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full storybook profile →

pick Fumadocs if

  • You want the Fumadocs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Fumadocs fits your workflow better

full Fumadocs profile →

About storybook

Storybook is an open source, MIT licensed frontend workshop, written in TypeScript, for building, documenting, and testing UI components and pages in isolation, aimed at frontend engineers and design system teams working in React, Angular, Vue, Svelte, React Native, HTML, and other supported renderers.

read the full storybook overview →

About Fumadocs

Fumadocs is a documentation framework for React.js and Astro. It is written in TypeScript and released under the MIT license. The project targets documentation websites. It lives in the React.js and Astro documentation ecosystem. The supplied registry category is Content & Publishing / Documentation & Knowledge Base. The supplied repository metadata lists 13,134 stars and 728 forks. The supplied repository age is 0 years, and the last push timestamp is 2026 09 14T12:45:01Z.

read the full Fumadocs overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K gatsby ★ 56K

Related comparisons

storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs devdocs understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike hugo vs strapi hugo vs payload hugo vs halo hugo vs filament strapi vs payload strapi vs halo hugo vs wagtail hugo vs decap-cms

More Documentation & Knowledge Base projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Documentation & Knowledge Base field.

storybook vs Understand-Anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material storybook vs BookStack storybook vs deepwiki-open storybook vs Docs storybook vs jsdoc storybook vs Skill_Seekers storybook vs gollum storybook vs cheat

Frequently asked questions

Is storybook or Fumadocs more popular?

storybook has 91,081 GitHub stars and Fumadocs has 13,171. storybook has the larger community by that measure.

Are storybook and Fumadocs free?

Both are open source. storybook is licensed under MIT and Fumadocs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between storybook and Fumadocs?

storybook is written in TypeScript and Fumadocs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, storybook or Fumadocs?

Choose storybook if you want the larger community (91,081 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Fumadocs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.