head to head · open source

starrocks vs clickvisual

starrocks has 12,125 GitHub stars, 2,594 forks, 1,443 open issues and last shipped today. clickvisual has 1,643 stars, 238 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. starrocks leads on adoption by 638% (12,125 vs 1,643 stars). starrocks is written in Java under Apache-2.0; clickvisual is written in Go under MIT. starrocks has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, clickvisual 14%. starrocks was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

starrocks ★ 12K clickvisual ★ 1.6K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

starrocks clickvisual
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.6K ⑂ 238
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick starrocks if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full starrocks profile →

pick clickvisual if

  • You want the clickvisual feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and clickvisual fits your workflow better

full clickvisual profile →

About starrocks

StarRocks is an Apache 2.0, Linux Foundation open query engine written in Java that delivers sub second ad hoc and multi dimensional analytics both on and off the data lakehouse, built for data platform teams, analytics engineers, and BI users who need fast SQL over large distributed datasets without moving data or rewriting SQL.

read the full starrocks overview →

About clickvisual

ClickVisual is a lightweight, browser based log analytics and log search platform for ClickHouse, aimed at teams that already store their logs in ClickHouse and want querying, dashboards, and alerting without operating a full Elasticsearch stack.

read the full clickvisual overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

duckdb vs krayin duckdb vs listmonk duckdb vs goaccess duckdb vs excelize duckdb vs claude-seo duckdb vs billion-mail duckdb vs billionmail duckdb vs mysql opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip

More Marketing & Customer Engagement projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Marketing & Customer Engagement field.

starrocks vs duckdb starrocks vs Krayin starrocks vs Listmonk starrocks vs goaccess starrocks vs excelize starrocks vs claude-seo starrocks vs Billion Mail starrocks vs BillionMail starrocks vs dbt starrocks vs trino starrocks vs perspective starrocks vs Kutt

Frequently asked questions

Is starrocks or clickvisual more popular?

starrocks has 12,125 GitHub stars and clickvisual has 1,643. starrocks has the larger community by that measure.

Are starrocks and clickvisual free?

Both are open source. starrocks is licensed under Apache-2.0 and clickvisual under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between starrocks and clickvisual?

starrocks is written in Java and clickvisual in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, starrocks or clickvisual?

Choose starrocks if you want the larger community (12,125 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose clickvisual if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.