head to head · open source
stagehand vs stealth-browser-mcp
stagehand has 25,934 GitHub stars, 1,808 forks, 376 open issues and last shipped yesterday. stealth-browser-mcp has 3,331 stars, 411 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. stagehand leads on adoption by 679% (25,934 vs 3,331 stars). stagehand is written in TypeScript under MIT; stealth-browser-mcp is written in Python under MIT. stagehand has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, stealth-browser-mcp 12%. stagehand was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser-automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| stagehand | stealth-browser-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 26K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 411 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick stagehand if
- You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick stealth-browser-mcp if
- You want the stealth-browser-mcp feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and stealth-browser-mcp fits your workflow better
About stagehand
Stagehand is the SDK to extract data and interact with any site on the web. Playwright was built for testing. Stagehand is built for agents, in TypeScript, Python, and Go. Docs · Quickstart · ⭐ Star this repo AI that uses the browser like humans. Sign in once, keep the session, and pull structured data out the other side. Python Go Install Python Go Local runs need Chrome installed. Full setup: Quickstart. Why Stagehand Token efficiency Hybrid accessibilit
read the full stagehand overview →
About stealth-browser-mcp
Stealth Browser MCP Stealth browser automation for MCP compatible AI agents. Navigate Cloudflare challenges, anti bot checks, and login walls with real Chrome family browser instances powered by nodriver, Chrome DevTools Protocol, and FastMCP. Sponsors NodeMaven — The most efficient proxy provider for Web Scraping and Automation with the Highest Quality IP on the market. Why NodeMaven? ZIP targeting 99.9% uptime IP filtering: all proxies have fraud score RapidProxy powers scraping and automation with 90M+ residential IPs across 200+ countries, supporting rotation, geo targeting, and high concurrency to improve…
read the full stealth-browser-mcp overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is stagehand or stealth-browser-mcp more popular?
stagehand has 25,934 GitHub stars and stealth-browser-mcp has 3,331. stagehand has the larger community by that measure.
Are stagehand and stealth-browser-mcp free?
Both are open source. stagehand is licensed under MIT and stealth-browser-mcp under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between stagehand and stealth-browser-mcp?
stagehand is written in TypeScript and stealth-browser-mcp in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, stagehand or stealth-browser-mcp?
Choose stagehand if you want the larger community (25,934 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose stealth-browser-mcp if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.