head to head · open source

kanboard vs SparkleShare

kanboard has 9,874 GitHub stars, 1,996 forks, 160 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. SparkleShare has 4,979 stars, 569 forks, 69 open issues and last shipped 19 days ago. kanboard leads on adoption by 98% (9,874 vs 4,979 stars). kanboard is written in PHP under MIT; SparkleShare is written in C# under GPL-3.0. kanboard has attracted 20% as many forks as stars, SparkleShare 11%. kanboard was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kanboard ★ 9.9K SparkleShare ★ 5.0K category Business Software

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kanboard SparkleShare
GitHub stars ★ 9.9K ★ 5.0K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in PHP C#
Last push 2026-09-11 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 2.0K ⑂ 569
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kanboard if

  • You weight community size — 9.9K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PHP
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kanboard profile →

pick SparkleShare if

  • You want the SparkleShare feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and SparkleShare fits your workflow better

full SparkleShare profile →

About kanboard

Kanboard is MIT licensed, self hosted Kanban project management software written in PHP, aimed at teams and individuals who want to run their own board based task tracking instead of renting a hosted service.

read the full kanboard overview →

About SparkleShare

SparkleShare is a free and open source file sharing and collaboration application written in C and released under the GNU GPLv3 or later, with its Sparkles library under the GNU LGPLv3 or later. It runs on Linux distributions, macOS, and Windows, and it lives in the desktop and self hosted cloud storage ecosystem alongside the Git and Git LFS tooling it depends on. The project has been on GitHub for roughly sixteen years, carries about 4,979 stars and 569 forks, and had its most recent push in September 2026.

read the full SparkleShare overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 44K

Related comparisons

opencode vs vibe-kanban conductor vs vibe-kanban vibe-kanban vs wekan vibe-kanban vs qinglong vibe-kanban vs edict vibe-kanban vs openproject vibe-kanban vs onedev wekan vs qinglong plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip odoo vs erpnext odoo vs grocy odoo vs greaterwms odoo vs shelf odoo vs ralph odoo vs part-db-server odoo vs open-mercato odoo vs steedos-platform

More Project & Work Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Project & Work Management field.

kanboard vs vibe-kanban kanboard vs Wekan kanboard vs qinglong kanboard vs edict kanboard vs OpenProject kanboard vs onedev kanboard vs Planka kanboard vs Leantime kanboard vs Kaneo kanboard vs ccpm kanboard vs Fizzy kanboard vs Backlog.md

Frequently asked questions

Is kanboard or SparkleShare more popular?

kanboard has 9,874 GitHub stars and SparkleShare has 4,979. kanboard has the larger community by that measure.

Are kanboard and SparkleShare free?

Both are open source. kanboard is licensed under MIT and SparkleShare under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kanboard and SparkleShare?

kanboard is written in PHP and SparkleShare in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kanboard or SparkleShare?

Choose kanboard if you want the larger community (9,874 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose SparkleShare if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.