head to head · open source
SkillSpector vs vuln-bank
SkillSpector has 23,981 GitHub stars, 2,070 forks, 136 open issues and last shipped yesterday. vuln-bank has 992 stars, 371 forks, 10 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. SkillSpector leads on adoption by 2,317% (23,981 vs 992 stars). SkillSpector is written in Python under Apache-2.0; vuln-bank is written in HTML under MIT. SkillSpector has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, vuln-bank 37%. SkillSpector was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai-security), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| SkillSpector | vuln-bank | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 992 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-22 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.1K | ⑂ 371 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick SkillSpector if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick vuln-bank if
- You want the vuln-bank feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and vuln-bank fits your workflow better
About SkillSpector
SkillSpector Security scanner for AI agent skills. Detect vulnerabilities, malicious patterns, and security risks before installing agent skills. Overview AI agent skills (used by Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, etc.) execute with implicit trust and minimal vetting. In the 31,132 skill analyzed subset of the research dataset, 26.1% of skills contain vulnerabilities and 5.2% show likely malicious intent . SkillSpector helps you answer: "Is this skill safe to install?" SkillSpector is part of the NVIDIA Verified Skills pipeline, which scans, evaluates, and signs agent skills before publication. Skills that…
read the full SkillSpector overview →
About vuln-bank
Vulnerable Bank Application 🏦 A deliberately vulnerable web application for practicing application security testing of Web, APIs and LLMs, secure code review and implementing security in CI/CD pipelines. ⚠️ WARNING: This application is intentionally vulnerable and should only be used for educational purposes in isolated environments. Overview This project is a simple banking application with multiple security vulnerabilities built in. It's designed to help security engineers, developers, interns, QA analyst and DevSecOps practitioners learn about: Common web application and API vulnerabilities AI/LLM…
read the full vuln-bank overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Security & Privacy projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Security & Privacy field.
Frequently asked questions
Is SkillSpector or vuln-bank more popular?
SkillSpector has 23,981 GitHub stars and vuln-bank has 992. SkillSpector has the larger community by that measure.
Are SkillSpector and vuln-bank free?
Both are open source. SkillSpector is licensed under Apache-2.0 and vuln-bank under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between SkillSpector and vuln-bank?
SkillSpector is written in Python and vuln-bank in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, SkillSpector or vuln-bank?
Choose SkillSpector if you want the larger community (23,981 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose vuln-bank if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.