head to head · open source
LibreChat vs screenpipe
LibreChat has 46,647 GitHub stars, 9,596 forks, 732 open issues and last shipped yesterday. screenpipe has 22,209 stars, 2,263 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreChat leads on adoption by 110% (46,647 vs 22,209 stars). LibreChat is written in TypeScript under MIT; screenpipe is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. LibreChat has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, screenpipe 10%. LibreChat was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| LibreChat | screenpipe | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 47K | ★ 22K |
| License | MIT | Custom / other |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 9.6K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick LibreChat if
- You weight community size — 47K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick screenpipe if
- You want the screenpipe feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and screenpipe fits your workflow better
About LibreChat
LibreChat English · 中文 🚀 What's New in v0.8.8 rc2 Agent run control: Interrupt an Agent before visible answer text, steer runs with files and quoted excerpts, durably queue follow ups, and recover saved partial work with Keep going or Answer now . Agent activity: Optional generated labels group reasoning and tool work, fold completed groups into live phase cards, keep generated files visible, summarize multi step phases, and show the current reasoning direction. Human in the loop Agents: Stream up to four related questions, pause for input or tool approval, and resume durably. Unified Agent Builder: Configure…
read the full LibreChat overview →
About screenpipe
DOWNLOAD SCREENPIPE [ screenpipe YC S26 ] Screenpipe remembers how you actually work Record your screen continuously locally and provide context to your agents (Claude, Codex, Openclaw, Hermes, Runner...) what is this? screenpipe capture all your computer work locally and power your agents remember everything never forget what you saw, heard, or did run agents that work based on what you do generate agents, skills, and automations based on what you do search with ai find anything using natural language 100% local your data lives on your machine only source available inspect, modify, audit (LICENSE.md) company…
read the full screenpipe overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is LibreChat or screenpipe more popular?
LibreChat has 46,647 GitHub stars and screenpipe has 22,209. LibreChat has the larger community by that measure.
Are LibreChat and screenpipe free?
Both are open source. LibreChat is licensed under MIT, and screenpipe has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between LibreChat and screenpipe ?
LibreChat is written in TypeScript and screenpipe in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, LibreChat or screenpipe ?
Choose LibreChat if you want the larger community (46,647 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose screenpipe if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.