head to head · open source
OpenClaw vs LibreChat
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars, 82,755 forks, 6,671 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LibreChat has 46,647 stars, 9,596 forks, 732 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenClaw leads on adoption by 744% (393,747 vs 46,647 stars). OpenClaw is written in TypeScript under MIT; LibreChat is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenClaw has attracted 21% as many forks as stars, LibreChat 21%. OpenClaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (ai), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenClaw | LibreChat | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 394K | ★ 47K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 83K | ⑂ 9.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenClaw if
- You weight community size — 394K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick LibreChat if
- You want the LibreChat feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and LibreChat fits your workflow better
About OpenClaw
OpenClaw 🦞 — Your assistant, on your devices, in your chats OpenClaw is an open source AI assistant that runs on your own computer and meets you in the channels you already use: Discord, iMessage, Slack, Teams, Telegram, WhatsApp, and 20+ more, plus native apps for macOS, iOS, Android, Windows, and Linux. One Gateway runs it as a personal assistant on a laptop or as a shared team deployment; configuration is the only difference. Yours, with no catch. State, memory, and credentials live on your hardware. Models and agent harnesses (Claude, Codex, local models) are plugins you can swap without changing anything…
read the full OpenClaw overview →
About LibreChat
LibreChat English · 中文 🚀 What's New in v0.8.8 rc2 Agent run control: Interrupt an Agent before visible answer text, steer runs with files and quoted excerpts, durably queue follow ups, and recover saved partial work with Keep going or Answer now . Agent activity: Optional generated labels group reasoning and tool work, fold completed groups into live phase cards, keep generated files visible, summarize multi step phases, and show the current reasoning direction. Human in the loop Agents: Stream up to four related questions, pause for input or tool approval, and resume durably. Unified Agent Builder: Configure…
read the full LibreChat overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenClaw or LibreChat more popular?
OpenClaw has 393,747 GitHub stars and LibreChat has 46,647. OpenClaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenClaw and LibreChat free?
Both are open source. OpenClaw is licensed under MIT and LibreChat under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenClaw and LibreChat?
OpenClaw is written in TypeScript and LibreChat in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenClaw or LibreChat?
Choose OpenClaw if you want the larger community (393,747 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose LibreChat if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.