head to head · open source

readest vs substance

readest has 24,413 GitHub stars, 1,586 forks, 145 open issues and last shipped yesterday. substance has 2,733 stars, 121 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped 6 months ago. readest leads on adoption by 793% (24,413 vs 2,733 stars). readest is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; substance is written in JavaScript under MIT. readest has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, substance 4%. readest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

readest ★ 24K substance ★ 2.7K category Content & Publishing

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

readest substance
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 2.7K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-04-02
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 121
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick readest if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full readest profile →

pick substance if

  • You want the substance feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and substance fits your workflow better

full substance profile →

About readest

Readest is an open source, cross platform ebook reader built with Next.js 16 and Tauri v2 for readers who want one modern library across macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, and the web.

read the full readest overview →

About substance

Substance is a JavaScript library for web based content editing. It lives in the JavaScript and Content & Publishing / Publishing ecosystem, and it is distributed under the MIT license. The README describes it as a library that provides building blocks for realizing custom text editors and web based publishing systems, and it was developed to power the online editing platform Substance.

read the full substance overview →

More in Content & Publishing

next.js ★ 142K storybook ★ 91K hugo ★ 90K Understand-Anything ★ 83K Strapi ★ 73K nuxt ★ 61K

Related comparisons

lerna vs readest lerna vs koreader lerna vs koodo-reader lerna vs calibre koreader vs koodo-reader lerna vs ebook2audiobook koreader vs calibre lerna vs calibre-web next-js vs nuxt next-js vs gatsby next-js vs ghost next-js vs jekyll next-js vs hexo next-js vs nextra next-js vs kit next-js vs vike storybook vs understand-anything storybook vs devdocs storybook vs docsify understand-anything vs devdocs storybook vs wiki storybook vs mkdocs-material understand-anything vs docsify understand-anything vs wiki

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

readest vs lerna readest vs koreader readest vs koodo-reader readest vs calibre readest vs ebook2audiobook readest vs calibre-web readest vs LibreTranslate readest vs PyMuPDF readest vs so-novel readest vs papermill readest vs Calibre-Web-Automated readest vs Weblate

Frequently asked questions

Is readest or substance more popular?

readest has 24,413 GitHub stars and substance has 2,733. readest has the larger community by that measure.

Are readest and substance free?

Both are open source. readest is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and substance under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between readest and substance?

readest is written in TypeScript and substance in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, readest or substance?

Choose readest if you want the larger community (24,413 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose substance if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.