head to head · open source

readest vs Publish-Docker-Github-Action

readest has 25,874 GitHub stars, 1,805 forks, 145 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Publish-Docker-Github-Action has 797 stars, 202 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. readest leads on adoption by 3,146% (25,874 vs 797 stars). readest is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; Publish-Docker-Github-Action is written in Shell under MIT. readest has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Publish-Docker-Github-Action 25%. readest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

readest ★ 26K Publish-Docker-Github-Action ★ 797 category Content & Publishing

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

readest Publish-Docker-Github-Action
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 797
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Shell
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 202
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick readest if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full readest profile →

pick Publish-Docker-Github-Action if

  • You want the Publish-Docker-Github-Action feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You evaluated both and Publish-Docker-Github-Action fits your workflow better

full Publish-Docker-Github-Action profile →

About readest

Readest [Readest][link website] is an open source ebook reader designed for immersive and deep reading experiences. Built as a modern rewrite of Foliate, it leverages Next.js 16 and Tauri v2 to deliver a smooth, cross platform experience across macOS, Windows, Linux, Android, iOS, and the Web. [![Website][badge website]][link website] [![Web App][badge web app]][link web readest] [![OS][badge platforms]][link website] [![Discord][badge discord]][link discord] [![Reddit][badge reddit]][link reddit] [![AGPL Licence][badge license]](LICENSE) [![Language Coverage][badge language coverage]][link locales]…

read the full readest overview →

About Publish-Docker-Github-Action

Publishes docker containers This Action for Docker uses the Git branch as the Docker tag for building and pushing the container. Hereby the master branch is published as the latest tag. Usage Example pipeline Mandatory Arguments name is the name of the image you would like to push username the login username for the registry password the authentication token [preferred] or login password for the registry. If you would like to publish the image to other registries, these actions might be helpful Outputs tag is the tag, which was pushed snapshot tag is the tag that is generated by the snapshot option and pushed…

read the full Publish-Docker-Github-Action overview →

More in Content & Publishing

Related comparisons

More Publishing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Publishing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is readest or Publish-Docker-Github-Action more popular?

readest has 25,874 GitHub stars and Publish-Docker-Github-Action has 797. readest has the larger community by that measure.

Are readest and Publish-Docker-Github-Action free?

Both are open source. readest is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Publish-Docker-Github-Action under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between readest and Publish-Docker-Github-Action?

readest is written in TypeScript and Publish-Docker-Github-Action in Shell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, readest or Publish-Docker-Github-Action?

Choose readest if you want the larger community (25,874 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Publish-Docker-Github-Action if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.