head to head · open source

ragflow vs open-science

ragflow has 91,015 GitHub stars, 10,780 forks, 1,525 open issues and last shipped today. open-science has 4,696 stars, 287 forks, 40 open issues and last shipped today. ragflow leads on adoption by 1,838% (91,015 vs 4,696 stars). ragflow is written in Go under Apache-2.0; open-science is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. ragflow has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, open-science 6%. ragflow was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ragflow ★ 91K open-science ★ 4.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ragflow open-science
GitHub stars ★ 91K ★ 4.7K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 11K ⑂ 287
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ragflow if

  • You weight community size — 91K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ragflow profile →

pick open-science if

  • You want the open-science feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and open-science fits your workflow better

full open-science profile →

About ragflow

RAGFlow is an open source Retrieval Augmented Generation engine that fuses RAG with agent capabilities into a context layer for large language models, built for developers and teams that need to turn complex, unstructured documents into production AI systems.

read the full ragflow overview →

About open-science

AIPOCH Open Science is an open source, local first, model agnostic AI research workbench that lets scientists and researchers run computational and data intensive research with scientific AI agents inside a single desktop workspace on macOS, Windows, and Linux.

read the full open-science overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all

More AI Development Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Development Platforms field.

ragflow vs Dify ragflow vs langchain ragflow vs ponytail ragflow vs generative-ai-for-beginners ragflow vs graphify ragflow vs claude-mem ragflow vs PaddleOCR ragflow vs Agent-Reach ragflow vs headroom ragflow vs Mem0 ragflow vs daily_stock_analysis ragflow vs LiteLLM

Frequently asked questions

Is ragflow or open-science more popular?

ragflow has 91,015 GitHub stars and open-science has 4,696. ragflow has the larger community by that measure.

Are ragflow and open-science free?

Both are open source. ragflow is licensed under Apache-2.0 and open-science under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ragflow and open-science?

ragflow is written in Go and open-science in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ragflow or open-science?

Choose ragflow if you want the larger community (91,015 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose open-science if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.