head to head · open source
QwenPaw vs telegram-bot-sdk
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars, 3,258 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. telegram-bot-sdk has 3,299 stars, 675 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 1,031% (37,316 vs 3,299 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; telegram-bot-sdk is written in PHP under BSD-3-Clause. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, telegram-bot-sdk 20%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| QwenPaw | telegram-bot-sdk | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 3.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | TypeScript | PHP |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-08-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 675 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick QwenPaw if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick telegram-bot-sdk if
- You want the telegram-bot-sdk feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches PHP
- You evaluated both and telegram-bot-sdk fits your workflow better
About QwenPaw
QwenPaw [Documentation] [中文] [日本語] [Русский] Works for you, grows with you. Your personal AI assistant — deploy locally or in the cloud, extend with Skills & Plugins, connect across every channel. What you can do with QwenPaw Automation & scheduling : Set up recurring tasks — news digests, report generation, multi channel broadcasting — all on your schedule. Code & development : Read, edit, review, and test code in your projects with the unified file workspace. Document processing : Read, write, and convert PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files. Information gathering : Search the web, follow subscriptions…
read the full QwenPaw overview →
About telegram-bot-sdk
[ ][link repo] Telegram Bot API PHP SDK ========================== Telegram Bot PHP SDK lets you develop Telegram Bots in PHP easily! Supports Laravel out of the box. [Telegram Bot API][link telegram bot api] is an HTTP based interface created for developers keen on building bots for Telegram. To learn more about the Telegram Bot API, please consult the [Introduction to Bots][link telegram bot api] and Bot FAQ on official Telegram site. To get started writing your bots using this SDK, Please refer the [documentation][link docs]. Supported Versions Only the latest released version of the SDK is supported. To…
read the full telegram-bot-sdk overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is QwenPaw or telegram-bot-sdk more popular?
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars and telegram-bot-sdk has 3,299. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are QwenPaw and telegram-bot-sdk free?
Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and telegram-bot-sdk under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between QwenPaw and telegram-bot-sdk?
QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and telegram-bot-sdk in PHP. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, QwenPaw or telegram-bot-sdk?
Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (37,316 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose telegram-bot-sdk if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.