head to head · open source
QwenPaw vs openilink-hub
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars, 3,258 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. openilink-hub has 1,606 stars, 151 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 2,224% (37,316 vs 1,606 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; openilink-hub is written in Go under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, openilink-hub 9%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| QwenPaw | openilink-hub | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 1.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-06-18 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 151 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick QwenPaw if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick openilink-hub if
- You want the openilink-hub feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and openilink-hub fits your workflow better
About QwenPaw
QwenPaw [Documentation] [中文] [日本語] [Русский] Works for you, grows with you. Your personal AI assistant — deploy locally or in the cloud, extend with Skills & Plugins, connect across every channel. What you can do with QwenPaw Automation & scheduling : Set up recurring tasks — news digests, report generation, multi channel broadcasting — all on your schedule. Code & development : Read, edit, review, and test code in your projects with the unified file workspace. Document processing : Read, write, and convert PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files. Information gathering : Search the web, follow subscriptions…
read the full QwenPaw overview →
About openilink-hub
免责声明 ：本项目基于公开的 iLink 协议进行独立开发，仅供学习交流与技术研究使用。项目与 iLink 协议的官方团队无任何关联或授权关系。若相关权利方认为本项目存在侵权，请通过 Issue 联系我们，我们将在确认后第一时间予以下架处理。 Disclaimer: This project is independently developed based on the publicly available iLink protocol for learning and research purposes only. It is not affiliated with or endorsed by the official iLink team. If any rights holder believes this project infringes upon their rights, please contact us via an Issue and we will take it down promptly upon confirmation. 微信 ClawBot iLink 协议的开源消息管理平台 + App 应用市场 Open source message management platform + App Marketplace for WeChat ClawBot (iLink protocol)…
read the full openilink-hub overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is QwenPaw or openilink-hub more popular?
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars and openilink-hub has 1,606. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are QwenPaw and openilink-hub free?
Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and openilink-hub under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between QwenPaw and openilink-hub?
QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and openilink-hub in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, QwenPaw or openilink-hub?
Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (37,316 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose openilink-hub if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.