head to head · open source

QwenPaw vs maid

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars, 3,119 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped today. maid has 2,695 stars, 289 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 1,204% (35,130 vs 2,695 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; maid is written in TypeScript under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, maid 11%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

QwenPaw ★ 35K maid ★ 2.7K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

QwenPaw maid
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 2.7K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 289
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick QwenPaw if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full QwenPaw profile →

pick maid if

  • You want the maid feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and maid fits your workflow better

full maid profile →

About QwenPaw

QwenPaw is a personal AI assistant harness under the Apache 2.0 licence, aimed at people who want an LLM agent running on their own machine or in their own cloud account and reachable from the chat apps they already use.

read the full QwenPaw overview →

About maid

Maid is a free, MIT licensed Android application built with React Native that runs GGUF language models entirely on device through llama.cpp and connects to remote providers such as Anthropic, DeepSeek, Ollama, Mistral and OpenAI using the user's own API keys.

read the full maid overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

QwenPaw vs OpenClaw QwenPaw vs Hermes Agent QwenPaw vs Open WebUI QwenPaw vs ComfyUI QwenPaw vs odysseus QwenPaw vs LobeChat QwenPaw vs AnythingLLM QwenPaw vs Cherry Studio QwenPaw vs nanobot QwenPaw vs Jan QwenPaw vs LibreChat QwenPaw vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is QwenPaw or maid more popular?

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars and maid has 2,695. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are QwenPaw and maid free?

Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and maid under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between QwenPaw and maid?

QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and maid in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, QwenPaw or maid?

Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (35,130 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose maid if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.