head to head · open source

QwenPaw vs lobe-ui

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars, 3,119 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped today. lobe-ui has 2,207 stars, 269 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped yesterday. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 1,492% (35,130 vs 2,207 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; lobe-ui is written in TypeScript under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, lobe-ui 12%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

QwenPaw ★ 35K lobe-ui ★ 2.2K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

QwenPaw lobe-ui
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 269
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick QwenPaw if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full QwenPaw profile →

pick lobe-ui if

  • You want the lobe-ui feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and lobe-ui fits your workflow better

full lobe-ui profile →

About QwenPaw

QwenPaw is a personal AI assistant harness under the Apache 2.0 licence, aimed at people who want an LLM agent running on their own machine or in their own cloud account and reachable from the chat apps they already use.

read the full QwenPaw overview →

About lobe-ui

Lobe UI is an MIT licensed, TypeScript first React component library for building AIGC web applications, aimed at front end teams shipping chat, assistant, and generative AI interfaces who want Ant Design's foundation with AI oriented components and providers already wired together.

read the full lobe-ui overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

QwenPaw vs OpenClaw QwenPaw vs Hermes Agent QwenPaw vs Open WebUI QwenPaw vs ComfyUI QwenPaw vs odysseus QwenPaw vs LobeChat QwenPaw vs AnythingLLM QwenPaw vs Cherry Studio QwenPaw vs nanobot QwenPaw vs Jan QwenPaw vs LibreChat QwenPaw vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is QwenPaw or lobe-ui more popular?

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars and lobe-ui has 2,207. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are QwenPaw and lobe-ui free?

Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lobe-ui under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between QwenPaw and lobe-ui?

QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and lobe-ui in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, QwenPaw or lobe-ui?

Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (35,130 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lobe-ui if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.