head to head · open source
QwenPaw vs koishi
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars, 3,258 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. koishi has 6,313 stars, 360 forks, 107 open issues and last shipped 28 days ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 491% (37,316 vs 6,313 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; koishi is written in TypeScript under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, koishi 6%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| QwenPaw | koishi | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 6.3K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-08 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 360 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick QwenPaw if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick koishi if
- You want the koishi feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and koishi fits your workflow better
About QwenPaw
QwenPaw [Documentation] [中文] [日本語] [Русский] Works for you, grows with you. Your personal AI assistant — deploy locally or in the cloud, extend with Skills & Plugins, connect across every channel. What you can do with QwenPaw Automation & scheduling : Set up recurring tasks — news digests, report generation, multi channel broadcasting — all on your schedule. Code & development : Read, edit, review, and test code in your projects with the unified file workspace. Document processing : Read, write, and convert PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files. Information gathering : Search the web, follow subscriptions…
read the full QwenPaw overview →
About koishi
Koishi Koishi 是一个跨平台、可扩展、高性能的聊天机器人框架。 它的名字和图标设计来源于来源于东方 Project 中的角色古明地恋 (Komeiji Koishi)。古明地恋是一个会做出无意识举动的角色，取这个名字既象征着聊天机器人的主题，也蕴含了开发者为之倾注的热爱。 特性 开箱即用 Koishi 提供了高度便利的控制台，让你无需基础让你在几分钟之内搭建自己的聊天机器人。 提供在线插件市场，即使没有任何编程基础，也能轻松在控制台中下载安装插件 支持 QQ，Telegram，Discord，飞书等主流聊天平台，支持多账户和跨平台数据互通 随时随地通过控制面板监控运行状态，控制机器人的行为，甚至上号聊天 生态丰富 经过了长达四年的迭代，Koishi 已经发展出了丰富的插件生态和与之匹配的健壮系统。超过 3000 个官方和社区插件覆盖了机器人开发的方方面面，从平台支持、数据库、资源存储、网页控制台、状态管理到具体的业务功能一应俱全。无论你的目标是构建大型交互应用还是轻量级的辅助机器人，Koishi 都为你提供了最佳实践。如果担心在复杂的功能中迷失方向，我们也准备了细致的文档来提供帮助。 专为开发者打造 Koishi 更为开发者准备了众多专业功能，使插件开发者得以在各种复杂需求中构建规模化的解决方案。 类型支持：Koishi 完全基于 TypeScript
read the full koishi overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is QwenPaw or koishi more popular?
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars and koishi has 6,313. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are QwenPaw and koishi free?
Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and koishi under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between QwenPaw and koishi?
QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and koishi in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, QwenPaw or koishi?
Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (37,316 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose koishi if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.