head to head · open source

QwenPaw vs hope-agent

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars, 3,119 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped today. hope-agent has 1,605 stars, 153 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 2,089% (35,130 vs 1,605 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; hope-agent is written in Rust under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, hope-agent 10%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (agent, chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

QwenPaw ★ 35K hope-agent ★ 1.6K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

QwenPaw hope-agent
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 1.6K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 153
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick QwenPaw if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full QwenPaw profile →

pick hope-agent if

  • You want the hope-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and hope-agent fits your workflow better

full hope-agent profile →

About QwenPaw

QwenPaw is a personal AI assistant harness under the Apache 2.0 licence, aimed at people who want an LLM agent running on their own machine or in their own cloud account and reachable from the chat apps they already use.

read the full QwenPaw overview →

About hope-agent

Hope Agent is a local first, cross device desktop AI agent written in Rust that keeps long term memory, pursues goals autonomously, dynamically orchestrates multiple agents, and can also run headlessly as a resident service, for individuals and teams who want an assistant that works on their own desktop, NAS, or cloud host.

read the full hope-agent overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

QwenPaw vs OpenClaw QwenPaw vs Hermes Agent QwenPaw vs Open WebUI QwenPaw vs ComfyUI QwenPaw vs odysseus QwenPaw vs LobeChat QwenPaw vs AnythingLLM QwenPaw vs Cherry Studio QwenPaw vs nanobot QwenPaw vs Jan QwenPaw vs LibreChat QwenPaw vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is QwenPaw or hope-agent more popular?

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars and hope-agent has 1,605. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are QwenPaw and hope-agent free?

Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and hope-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between QwenPaw and hope-agent?

QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and hope-agent in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, QwenPaw or hope-agent?

Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (35,130 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose hope-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.