head to head · open source

QwenPaw vs errbot

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars, 3,119 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped today. errbot has 3,306 stars, 624 forks, 45 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 963% (35,130 vs 3,306 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; errbot is written in Python under GPL-3.0. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, errbot 19%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

QwenPaw ★ 35K errbot ★ 3.3K category AI & Machine Learning

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

QwenPaw errbot
GitHub stars ★ 35K ★ 3.3K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-08-17
Forks ⑂ 3.1K ⑂ 624
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick QwenPaw if

  • You weight community size — 35K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full QwenPaw profile →

pick errbot if

  • You want the errbot feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and errbot fits your workflow better

full errbot profile →

About QwenPaw

QwenPaw is a personal AI assistant harness under the Apache 2.0 licence, aimed at people who want an LLM agent running on their own machine or in their own cloud account and reachable from the chat apps they already use.

read the full QwenPaw overview →

About errbot

Errbot is a chatbot daemon written in Python and released under the GPL 3.0 licence that connects to a chat service and lets people start scripts, plugins and operational tasks directly from the conversation, aimed at developers and operations teams who want ChatOps inside the chat tools they already use.

read the full errbot overview →

More in AI & Machine Learning

OpenClaw ★ 390K Hermes Agent ★ 247K Ollama ★ 181K Dify ★ 157K Open WebUI ★ 153K langchain ★ 147K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs hermes-agent openclaw vs opencode openclaw vs n8n openclaw vs open-webui openclaw vs comfyui openclaw vs odysseus openclaw vs lobechat openclaw vs anythingllm openclaw vs ollama ollama vs llama-cpp ollama vs vllm ollama vs odysseus ollama vs gpt4all ollama vs llama-index ollama vs localai open-webui vs gpt4all openclaw vs dify openclaw vs multica openclaw vs langgraph n8n vs dify dify vs langflow dify vs open-webui dify vs langchain dify vs ponytail

More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.

QwenPaw vs OpenClaw QwenPaw vs Hermes Agent QwenPaw vs Open WebUI QwenPaw vs ComfyUI QwenPaw vs odysseus QwenPaw vs LobeChat QwenPaw vs AnythingLLM QwenPaw vs Cherry Studio QwenPaw vs nanobot QwenPaw vs Jan QwenPaw vs LibreChat QwenPaw vs chatbox

Frequently asked questions

Is QwenPaw or errbot more popular?

QwenPaw has 35,130 GitHub stars and errbot has 3,306. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.

Are QwenPaw and errbot free?

Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and errbot under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between QwenPaw and errbot?

QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and errbot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, QwenPaw or errbot?

Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (35,130 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose errbot if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.