head to head · open source
QwenPaw vs chatgpt_telegram_bot
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars, 3,258 forks, 990 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,552 stars, 1,907 forks, 56 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. QwenPaw leads on adoption by 572% (37,316 vs 5,552 stars). QwenPaw is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; chatgpt_telegram_bot is written in Python under MIT. QwenPaw has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, chatgpt_telegram_bot 34%. QwenPaw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| QwenPaw | chatgpt_telegram_bot | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 37K | ★ 5.6K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-06-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.3K | ⑂ 1.9K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick QwenPaw if
- You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatgpt_telegram_bot if
- You want the chatgpt_telegram_bot feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and chatgpt_telegram_bot fits your workflow better
About QwenPaw
QwenPaw [Documentation] [中文] [日本語] [Русский] Works for you, grows with you. Your personal AI assistant — deploy locally or in the cloud, extend with Skills & Plugins, connect across every channel. What you can do with QwenPaw Automation & scheduling : Set up recurring tasks — news digests, report generation, multi channel broadcasting — all on your schedule. Code & development : Read, edit, review, and test code in your projects with the unified file workspace. Document processing : Read, write, and convert PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint files. Information gathering : Search the web, follow subscriptions…
read the full QwenPaw overview →
About chatgpt_telegram_bot
🤖 ChatGPT Telegram Bot ChatGPT, re created as a Telegram bot — and it works great. GPT 5.5 · Anthropic Claude (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) · Vision · Voice · Image generation Fast replies, no daily limits, message streaming and 15 special chat modes. Web chatbots are great — but they're often laggy, rate limited, and locked behind a browser tab. This project puts the best models from OpenAI and Anthropic right inside Telegram , with your own API keys and no daily limits. 🚀 Try the live bot: @jadvebot · 🌐 Web: jadve.com — or deploy your own in two commands (Quick start ↓). ✨ Features ⚡ Low latency — replies usually…
read the full chatgpt_telegram_bot overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is QwenPaw or chatgpt_telegram_bot more popular?
QwenPaw has 37,316 GitHub stars and chatgpt_telegram_bot has 5,552. QwenPaw has the larger community by that measure.
Are QwenPaw and chatgpt_telegram_bot free?
Both are open source. QwenPaw is licensed under Apache-2.0 and chatgpt_telegram_bot under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between QwenPaw and chatgpt_telegram_bot?
QwenPaw is written in TypeScript and chatgpt_telegram_bot in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, QwenPaw or chatgpt_telegram_bot?
Choose QwenPaw if you want the larger community (37,316 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose chatgpt_telegram_bot if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.