head to head · open source
quivr vs poco-claw
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars, 3,731 forks, 9 open issues and last shipped yesterday. poco-claw has 1,356 stars, 129 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. quivr leads on adoption by 2,822% (39,624 vs 1,356 stars). quivr is written in Go under MIT; poco-claw is written in Python under MIT. quivr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, poco-claw 10%. quivr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, chatbot), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| quivr | poco-claw | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 40K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.7K | ⑂ 129 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick quivr if
- You weight community size — 40K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick poco-claw if
- You want the poco-claw feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and poco-claw fits your workflow better
About quivr
Quivr V2 An open source engine that turns continuous content streams into search and monitoring. Quivr V2 ingests content durably, makes it searchable within seconds, enriches it in the background and lets you follow a topic over time. The core stays generic: formats, AI models and business rules belong in plugins, so you can adapt Quivr to your domain without forking the platform. Status: evaluation stage. The API is v0 and may change without notice. Do not run it in production yet. Why Quivr V2 Durable before fast. A write is acknowledged only once it is committed; outages delay processing, they never lose or…
read the full quivr overview →
About poco-claw
Poco: Your Pocket Coworker A safer, more beautiful, and easier to use OpenClaw alternative English 简体中文 Core Features Server and Channel Collaboration Work in long lived servers with channels, DMs, and reply threads. Mention persistent agents in the conversation, turn messages into trackable tasks, inspect execution progress in the drawer, and publish outputs into shared files for people and other agents to reuse. Secure Sandbox All tasks run in an isolated container. Feel free to install dependencies, modify files, and execute commands — without affecting the host environment. Local Directory Mounting — mount…
read the full poco-claw overview →
More in AI & Machine Learning
Related comparisons
More AI Interaction & Interfaces projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Interaction & Interfaces field.
Frequently asked questions
Is quivr or poco-claw more popular?
quivr has 39,624 GitHub stars and poco-claw has 1,356. quivr has the larger community by that measure.
Are quivr and poco-claw free?
Both are open source. quivr is licensed under MIT and poco-claw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between quivr and poco-claw?
quivr is written in Go and poco-claw in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, quivr or poco-claw?
Choose quivr if you want the larger community (39,624 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose poco-claw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.