head to head · open source

pwd.sh vs rowel

pwd.sh has 1,563 GitHub stars, 135 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. rowel has 944 stars, 80 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped today. pwd.sh leads on adoption by 66% (1,563 vs 944 stars). pwd.sh is written in Shell under MIT; rowel is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. pwd.sh has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, rowel 8%. rowel was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (cryptography, encryption, password, password-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

pwd.sh ★ 1.6K rowel ★ 944 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

pwd.sh rowel
GitHub stars ★ 1.6K ★ 944
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Shell TypeScript
Last push 2026-08-24 2026-09-25
Forks ⑂ 135 ⑂ 80
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick pwd.sh if

  • You weight community size — 1.6K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Shell
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full pwd.sh profile →

pick rowel if

  • You want the rowel feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and rowel fits your workflow better

full rowel profile →

About pwd.sh

pwd.sh is a Bash script that manages text secrets such as passwords by storing each one in a GnuPG symmetric encrypted file, and it is for people who work in a terminal and prefer to keep their own encrypted store rather than hand it to a hosted password service.

read the full pwd.sh overview →

About rowel

Rowel is a free, offline first password manager for macOS, Windows and Linux that keeps logins, credit card details and secure notes in a locally stored, encrypted SQLite vault, built for individuals who would rather own their secrets than store them in a hosted service.

read the full rowel overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

pwd.sh vs Keycloak pwd.sh vs JumpServer pwd.sh vs Better Auth pwd.sh vs authelia pwd.sh vs Authentik pwd.sh vs casbin pwd.sh vs Sa-Token pwd.sh vs hydra pwd.sh vs SuperTokens pwd.sh vs Zitadel pwd.sh vs oauth2-proxy pwd.sh vs Logto

Frequently asked questions

Is pwd.sh or rowel more popular?

pwd.sh has 1,563 GitHub stars and rowel has 944. pwd.sh has the larger community by that measure.

Are pwd.sh and rowel free?

Both are open source. pwd.sh is licensed under MIT and rowel under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between pwd.sh and rowel?

pwd.sh is written in Shell and rowel in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, pwd.sh or rowel?

Choose pwd.sh if you want the larger community (1,563 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose rowel if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.