head to head · open source
proxy_pool vs katana
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. katana has 17,786 stars, 1,213 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped yesterday. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 34% (23,778 vs 17,786 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; katana is written in Go under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, katana 7%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| proxy_pool | katana | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 24K | ★ 18K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-06-15 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.4K | ⑂ 1.2K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick proxy_pool if
- You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick katana if
- You want the katana feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and katana fits your workflow better
About proxy_pool
ProxyPool 爬虫代理IP池 ======= ( ) 0: try: html = requests.get(' proxies={"http": " 使用代理访问 return html except Exception: retry count = 1 删除代理池中代理 delete proxy(proxy) return None python from fetcher.baseFetcher import BaseFetcher from util.webRequest import WebRequest class MyProxyFetcher(BaseFetcher): """我的代理源""" name = "myproxy" url = " enabled = True def fetch(self): r = WebRequest().get(" for item in r.json: yield item["ip"] + ":" + item["port"] 2、添加好后， schedule 进程下次抓取时会自动扫描 fetcher/sources/ 目录并启用新代理源，无需修改配置。 可用 python proxyPool.py fetcher 命令查看当前启用的代理源列表。 如需临时禁用某个代理源，在 setting.py 的 PROXY FETCHER EXCLUDE 黑名单中添加其…
read the full proxy_pool overview →
About katana
A next generation crawling and spidering framework Features • Installation • Usage • Scope • Config • Filters • Join Discord Features Fast And fully configurable web crawling Standard and Headless mode JavaScript parsing / crawling Customizable automatic form filling Scope control Preconfigured field / Regex Knowledge base ML page type / form classification (auto downloaded model) Customizable output Preconfigured fields INPUT STDIN , URL and LIST OUTPUT STDOUT , FILE and JSON Installation katana requires Go 1.26+ to install successfully. If you encounter any installation issues, we recommend trying with the…
read the full katana overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.
Frequently asked questions
Is proxy_pool or katana more popular?
proxy_pool has 23,778 GitHub stars and katana has 17,786. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.
Are proxy_pool and katana free?
Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and katana under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between proxy_pool and katana?
proxy_pool is written in Python and katana in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, proxy_pool or katana?
Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,778 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose katana if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.