head to head · open source

proxy_pool vs katana

proxy_pool has 23,707 GitHub stars, 5,418 forks, 298 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. katana has 17,518 stars, 1,183 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. proxy_pool leads on adoption by 35% (23,707 vs 17,518 stars). proxy_pool is written in Python under MIT; katana is written in Go under MIT. proxy_pool has attracted 23% as many forks as stars, katana 7%. katana was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (crawler), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

proxy_pool ★ 24K katana ★ 18K category Data & Analytics

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

proxy_pool katana
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 18K
License MIT MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-06-15 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 5.4K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick proxy_pool if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full proxy_pool profile →

pick katana if

  • You want the katana feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and katana fits your workflow better

full katana profile →

About proxy_pool

proxy pool is a self hosted Python proxy IP pool for web spiders that continuously collects, checks, and serves rotating HTTP proxies from public free proxy sources through a Redis backed pool.

read the full proxy_pool overview →

About katana

Katana is an open source, MIT licensed crawling and spidering framework written in Go, built for security engineers and automation pipelines that need to map web applications at scale rather than explore them by hand.

read the full katana overview →

More in Data & Analytics

Mermaid ★ 90K Crawl4AI ★ 84K Scrapling ★ 82K Apache Superset ★ 75K echarts ★ 67K scrapy ★ 64K

Related comparisons

crawl4ai vs scrapling crawl4ai vs scrapy scrapling vs scrapy crawl4ai vs easyspider scrapling vs easyspider crawl4ai vs changedetection-io scrapling vs changedetection-io crawl4ai vs lux mermaid vs apache-superset mermaid vs echarts apache-superset vs echarts mermaid vs metabase mermaid vs pixijs mermaid vs diagram-design apache-superset vs metabase apache-superset vs pixijs mermaid vs clickhouse crawl4ai vs clickhouse scrapling vs clickhouse apache-superset vs clickhouse mermaid vs apache-pinot crawl4ai vs apache-pinot scrapling vs apache-pinot apache-superset vs apache-pinot

More Data Extraction & Web Scraping projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Data Extraction & Web Scraping field.

proxy_pool vs Crawl4AI proxy_pool vs Scrapling proxy_pool vs scrapy proxy_pool vs EasySpider proxy_pool vs changedetection.io proxy_pool vs lux proxy_pool vs CloakBrowser proxy_pool vs Scrapegraph-ai proxy_pool vs crawlee proxy_pool vs colly proxy_pool vs stagehand proxy_pool vs Douyin_TikTok_Download_API

Frequently asked questions

Is proxy_pool or katana more popular?

proxy_pool has 23,707 GitHub stars and katana has 17,518. proxy_pool has the larger community by that measure.

Are proxy_pool and katana free?

Both are open source. proxy_pool is licensed under MIT and katana under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between proxy_pool and katana?

proxy_pool is written in Python and katana in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, proxy_pool or katana?

Choose proxy_pool if you want the larger community (23,707 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose katana if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.