head to head · open source

prowler vs HardeningKitty

prowler has 14,830 GitHub stars, 2,389 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HardeningKitty has 1,838 stars, 213 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. prowler leads on adoption by 707% (14,830 vs 1,838 stars). prowler is written in Python under Apache-2.0; HardeningKitty is written in PowerShell under MIT. prowler has attracted 16% as many forks as stars, HardeningKitty 12%. prowler was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

prowler ★ 15K HardeningKitty ★ 1.8K category Business Software

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

prowler HardeningKitty
GitHub stars ★ 15K ★ 1.8K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Python PowerShell
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-07-21
Forks ⑂ 2.4K ⑂ 213
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick prowler if

  • You weight community size — 15K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full prowler profile →

pick HardeningKitty if

  • You want the HardeningKitty feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches PowerShell
  • You evaluated both and HardeningKitty fits your workflow better

full HardeningKitty profile →

About prowler

Prowler is an Apache 2.0, Python based open source cloud security platform that automates security and compliance assessments across AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud through thousands of ready to use checks, aimed at cloud security, compliance, and DevSecOps teams that need continuous posture management without a commercial licence.

read the full prowler overview →

About HardeningKitty

HardeningKitty is a PowerShell security tool from the Windows Hardening Project by Michael Schneider. It lives in the Windows ecosystem and supports audit, hardening, registry, checklist, and defense work. The stable version is signed with the code signing certificate of scip AG, and pull requests are sent to the development repository.

read the full HardeningKitty overview →

More in Business Software

Plane ★ 60K Twenty ★ 57K Odoo ★ 54K Cal.com ★ 49K Rocket.Chat ★ 46K cobalt ★ 43K

Related comparisons

lighthouse vs prowler lighthouse vs teleport lighthouse vs lynis lighthouse vs gs-quant lighthouse vs opa lighthouse vs amphion lighthouse vs checkov lighthouse vs kyverno plane vs rocket-chat plane vs cobalt plane vs buzz rocket-chat vs cobalt plane vs jitsi plane vs srs plane vs huly plane vs zulip plane vs anki twenty vs anki odoo vs anki cal-com vs anki plane vs tutor twenty vs tutor odoo vs tutor cal-com vs tutor

More Compliance & Risk Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Compliance & Risk Management field.

prowler vs lighthouse prowler vs teleport prowler vs lynis prowler vs gs-quant prowler vs opa prowler vs Amphion prowler vs checkov prowler vs kyverno prowler vs aircrack-ng prowler vs tfsec prowler vs rundeck prowler vs agent-governance-toolkit

Frequently asked questions

Is prowler or HardeningKitty more popular?

prowler has 14,830 GitHub stars and HardeningKitty has 1,838. prowler has the larger community by that measure.

Are prowler and HardeningKitty free?

Both are open source. prowler is licensed under Apache-2.0 and HardeningKitty under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between prowler and HardeningKitty?

prowler is written in Python and HardeningKitty in PowerShell. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, prowler or HardeningKitty?

Choose prowler if you want the larger community (14,830 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose HardeningKitty if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.