head to head · open source
PostHog vs Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
PostHog has 40,600 GitHub stars, 3,579 forks, 5,637 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789 stars, 464 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. PostHog leads on adoption by 362% (40,600 vs 8,789 stars). PostHog is written in Python under a custom or non-standard licence; Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is written in Python under MIT. PostHog has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor 5%. PostHog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (analytics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| PostHog | Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 41K | ★ 8.8K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Python |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-07-05 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.6K | ⑂ 464 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick PostHog if
- You weight community size — 41K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if
- You want the Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor fits your workflow better
About PostHog
Docs Community Roadmap Why PostHog? Changelog Bug reports PostHog is the open source platform for building self driving products PostHog provides every tool you need to build a successful product, and captures all the context agents need to proactively diagnose problems, uncover opportunities, and ship fixes: Self driving mode: Turn signals in your product data (errors, rage clicks, failed queries, and more) into researched reports and pull requests you review and merge. Product analytics: Autocapture or manually instrument event based analytics to understand user behavior and analyze data with visualization or…
read the full PostHog overview →
About Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor
🎯 Claude Code Usage Monitor A privacy first Claude Usage Ops companion for Claude Code. It combines a Rich live terminal monitor with official statusline rate limits , machine readable state/export output, provenance labels, forecasting, and an opt in local usage warehouse. 📑 Table of Contents ✨ Key Features 🚀 Installation ⚡ Modern Installation with uv (Recommended) 📦 Installation with pip 🛠️ Other Package Managers 📖 Usage Get Help Basic Usage Configuration Options Available Plans 🙏 Please Help Test This Release! ✨ Features & How It Works Current Features Understanding Claude Sessions Token Limits by Plan…
read the full Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor overview →
More in Data & Analytics
Related comparisons
More Web & Product Analytics projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Web & Product Analytics field.
Frequently asked questions
Is PostHog or Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor more popular?
PostHog has 40,600 GitHub stars and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor has 8,789. PostHog has the larger community by that measure.
Are PostHog and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor free?
Both are open source. PostHog has no licence declared in this registry, and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between PostHog and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor?
PostHog is written in Python and Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, PostHog or Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor?
Choose PostHog if you want the larger community (40,600 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Claude-Code-Usage-Monitor if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.