head to head · open source
pocket-id vs KeePassDX
pocket-id has 9,965 GitHub stars, 349 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. KeePassDX has 7,613 stars, 425 forks, 541 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. pocket-id leads on adoption by 31% (9,965 vs 7,613 stars). pocket-id is written in Go under BSD-2-Clause; KeePassDX is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. pocket-id has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, KeePassDX 6%. pocket-id was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (passkeys), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| pocket-id | KeePassDX | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 10.0K | ★ 7.6K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Go | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-11-03 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 349 | ⑂ 425 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick pocket-id if
- You weight community size — 10.0K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick KeePassDX if
- You want the KeePassDX feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and KeePassDX fits your workflow better
About pocket-id
Pocket ID Pocket ID is an easy to use OpenID Connect Certified™ and OAuth 2.0 provider that lets users sign in to your applications with passkeys. → Try out the Demo The goal of Pocket ID is to be a simple and easy to use. There are other self hosted OIDC and OAuth 2.0 providers like Keycloak or ORY Hydra but they are often too complex for simple use cases. Additionally, what makes Pocket ID special is that it only supports passkey authentication, which means you don’t need a password. Some people might not like this idea at first, but I believe passkeys are the future, and once you try them, you’ll love them…
read the full pocket-id overview →
About KeePassDX
Android KeePassDX Lightweight password safe and manager for Android , KeePassDX allows editing encrypted data in a single file in KeePass format and fill in the forms in a secure way. Features Passkeys for authentication and local storage of private keys . Biometric recognition for fast unlocking (fingerprint / face unlock / …). One Time Password management (HOTP / TOTP) for two factor authentication (2FA). Autofill for easy form filling with passwords. Magikeyboard to efficiently fill in any field. Create encrypted database files . Organisation of credentials by entry and in group trees. Allows opening and…
read the full KeePassDX overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is pocket-id or KeePassDX more popular?
pocket-id has 9,965 GitHub stars and KeePassDX has 7,613. pocket-id has the larger community by that measure.
Are pocket-id and KeePassDX free?
Both are open source. pocket-id is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and KeePassDX under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between pocket-id and KeePassDX?
pocket-id is written in Go and KeePassDX in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, pocket-id or KeePassDX?
Choose pocket-id if you want the larger community (9,965 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose KeePassDX if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.