head to head · open source

hydra vs pocket-id

hydra has 17,553 GitHub stars, 1,609 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. pocket-id has 9,230 stars, 312 forks, 98 open issues and last shipped yesterday. hydra leads on adoption by 90% (17,553 vs 9,230 stars). hydra is written in Go under Apache-2.0; pocket-id is written in Go under BSD-2-Clause. hydra has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, pocket-id 3%. pocket-id was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

hydra ★ 18K pocket-id ★ 9.2K category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

hydra pocket-id
GitHub stars ★ 18K ★ 9.2K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-07-29 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 1.6K ⑂ 312
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick hydra if

  • You weight community size — 18K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full hydra profile →

pick pocket-id if

  • You want the pocket-id feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and pocket-id fits your workflow better

full pocket-id profile →

About hydra

Ory Hydra is an OpenID Certified OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.1 provider written in Go and licensed under Apache 2.0, built for teams that need standards compliant token issuance, client management, and consent flows while user accounts stay in their own existing identity system.

read the full hydra overview →

About pocket-id

Pocket ID is a self hosted, OpenID Connect Certified™ and OAuth 2.0 provider, written in Go, that authenticates users with passkeys and passwords never, aimed at anyone who wants single sign on for their own applications without standing up a heavyweight identity platform.

read the full pocket-id overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs jumpserver keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authelia keycloak vs authentik jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authelia better-auth vs authelia payloadsallthethings vs vault vaultwarden vs vault payloadsallthethings vs unkey payloadsallthethings vs phase payloadsallthethings vs keyshade puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault payloadsallthethings vs anthropic-cybersecurity-skills payloadsallthethings vs projectdiscovery payloadsallthethings vs pentagi payloadsallthethings vs pentestgpt payloadsallthethings vs osintgram payloadsallthethings vs vuls payloadsallthethings vs osv-scanner payloadsallthethings vs nettacker

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

hydra vs Keycloak hydra vs JumpServer hydra vs Better Auth hydra vs authelia hydra vs Authentik hydra vs casbin hydra vs Sa-Token hydra vs SuperTokens hydra vs Zitadel hydra vs oauth2-proxy hydra vs Logto hydra vs casdoor

Frequently asked questions

Is hydra or pocket-id more popular?

hydra has 17,553 GitHub stars and pocket-id has 9,230. hydra has the larger community by that measure.

Are hydra and pocket-id free?

Both are open source. hydra is licensed under Apache-2.0 and pocket-id under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between hydra and pocket-id?

hydra is written in Go and pocket-id in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, hydra or pocket-id?

Choose hydra if you want the larger community (17,553 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose pocket-id if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.