head to head · open source
Plane vs FluidFramework
Plane has 59,546 GitHub stars, 5,776 forks, 1,103 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FluidFramework has 4,946 stars, 586 forks, 207 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Plane leads on adoption by 1,104% (59,546 vs 4,946 stars). Plane is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; FluidFramework is written in TypeScript under MIT. Plane has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, FluidFramework 12%. FluidFramework was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Plane | FluidFramework | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 60K | ★ 4.9K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 586 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Plane if
- You weight community size — 60K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick FluidFramework if
- You want the FluidFramework feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and FluidFramework fits your workflow better
About Plane
Plane is an open source project management platform for teams that need to track issues, run cycles, and manage product roadmaps without handing their data to a proprietary SaaS vendor, and it is aimed at engineering, product, and operations teams that would otherwise pay for Jira, Linear, ClickUp, or Asana.
read the full Plane overview →
About FluidFramework
FluidFramework is an MIT licensed TypeScript library from Microsoft for building distributed, real time collaborative web applications in JavaScript or TypeScript, aimed at developers who need shared, synchronized state across many clients without assembling that synchronization layer themselves.
read the full FluidFramework overview →
More in Business Software
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Communication projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Communication field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Plane or FluidFramework more popular?
Plane has 59,546 GitHub stars and FluidFramework has 4,946. Plane has the larger community by that measure.
Are Plane and FluidFramework free?
Both are open source. Plane is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and FluidFramework under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Plane and FluidFramework?
Plane is written in TypeScript and FluidFramework in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Plane or FluidFramework?
Choose Plane if you want the larger community (59,546 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose FluidFramework if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.